Jharkhand High Court
C.M.P./450/2026 of DINESHWAR PRASAD SINGH Vs UNION OF INDIA on 18 September 2026
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.M.P. No.450 of 2026 ------ Dineshwar Prasad Singh, son of Late Kamla Singh, resident of Bandhu Nagar, Hinoo, P.O. Hinoo, P.S. Doranda, District Ranchi. … … Petitioner Versus 1. Union of India. 2. The Chief Security Commissioner,
2026:JHHC:28328
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
C.M.P. No.450 of 2026
------
Dineshwar Prasad Singh, son of Late Kamla Singh, resident of Bandhu Nagar, Hinoo, P.O. Hinoo, P.S. Doranda, District Ranchi.
… … Petitioner
Versus
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Union of India.
2. The Chief Security Commissioner, Railway Protection Force, South Eastern Railways, at Garden Reach, P.O. Garden Reach, P.S. Garden Reach, District Kolkata, West Bengal.
3. The Divisional Security Commissioner, Railway Protection Force, South Eastern Railway, at Hatia, P.S. Jagarnathpur, District Ranchi.
4. ASC/ Ranchi, Railway Protection Force, South Eastern Railway, Ranchi, P.O., G.P.O., P.S. Chutia, District Ranchi. … … Opposite Parties
For the Petitioners : Mr. Shubham Mishra, Advocate
Mr. Gyandev Raj, Advocate
For the O.P.(s) : AC to ASGI ------- CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------
02/ 18.09.2026
Heard the parties.
2. This Civil Misc. Petition has been preferred for restoration of writ petition being W.P.(S) No.3344 of 2024, which was dismissed for non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 09.01.2025, for removing the surviving defect.
3. Learned counsel representing the petitioner begs an unconditional apology and submits that no sooner the writ petition is restored to its original file, he will remove the surviving defect.
4. Learned counsel representing the opposite parties do not oppose the aforesaid submission.
2026:JHHC:28328
5. Considering the submission of learned counsel representing the petitioner, this Civil Misc. Petition is allowed.
6. The writ petition being W.P.(S) No.3344 of 2024, is restored to its original file with a condition that the defect, if any, is still not removed, the same shall be removed within four weeks, failing which, this order will not be given effect to.
(ANANDA SEN, J.) 18th September, 2026 Prashant.Cp-2
Uploaded on 23.09.2026