Jharkhand High Court
Cont.(Cvl)/678/2026 of UMESH RAM Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 18 September 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No. 678 of 2026 ------- Umesh Ram son of late Manohar Ram, resident of village Jima, P.O Jima, P.;S. Kuru, District- Lohardaga, Jharkhand. .... Petitioner(s). Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Sri Sandeep Kumar Meena, the
2026:JHHC:28317
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cont. Case (Civil) No. 678 of 2026
-------
Umesh Ram son of late Manohar Ram, resident of village Jima, P.O Jima, P.;S. Kuru, District- Lohardaga, Jharkhand.
.... Petitioner(s).
Versus
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The State of Jharkhand
2. Sri Sandeep Kumar Meena, the Deputy Commissioner, Lohardaga.
3. Sri Abhijeet Kumar, the District Superintendent of Education, Lohardaga.
4. Shri Chandramauli Singh, the Accountant General (A&E), Doranda, Ranchi.
. … Opp. Party(s).
------
CORAM
: SRI ANANDA SEN, J.
------
For the Petitioner(s): Ms. Saman Ahmad, Advocate.
For the Opp. Party(s): Mr. J.F. Toppo, GA-V Mrs. Moushmi Chatterjee, AC to GA-V. For Acctt. General: M/s Richa Sanchita & Vidhan Kr. Singh, Advocate.
-----
03/18.09.2026 The petitioner has already been granted promotion. The only grievance, which remains is that the monetary benefit has not been given to him.
Thus, in my opinion that no contempt is made out. Accordingly, this contempt is dropped.
Pending interlocutory application, if any, also stands disposed of.
However, the petitioner is at liberty to approach the opposite parties for the monetary benefit by filing appropriate application.
(ANANDA SEN, J.) 18th September, 2026 Anu/-