Jharkhand High Court
Cr.A(SJ)/425/2026 of RAMJAN ANSARI Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 17 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Criminal Appeal (SJ) No. 425 of 2026 1.Ramjan Ansari S/o Sona Miyan aged about 46 years Residents of village Dhawaiya, P.S.-Ichak, P.O.- Ichak, District Hazaribag( Jharkhand) 2.Mohammad Moin Ansari S/o Ramjan Ansari aged about 31 years, Residents of Village
2026:JHHC:28081
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Criminal Appeal (SJ) No. 425 of 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Ramjan Ansari S/o Sona Miyan aged about 46 years Residents of village Dhawaiya, P.S.-Ichak, P.O.- Ichak, District Hazaribag( Jharkhand)
2. Mohammad Moin Ansari S/o Ramjan Ansari aged about 31 years, Residents of Village Dhawaiya P.S. Ichak P.O. Ichak, District Hazaribag (Jharkhand)
3. Haidar Ali S/O Anwar Ali aged about 30 years, Resident of Village Harhad , Post- Banha Nawada, P.S. Muffasil, District Hazaribag …....... Appellant
Vrs.
1. The State of Jharkhand
2. Victim
........ Respondent(s)
…....
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR
For the Appellant(s)
: Mr. Atul Kumar Tiwari, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Suraj Deo Munda, A.P.P.
07/17.09.2026 The present appeal has been preferred against the order dated 17.03.2025 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge VI cum Special Judge SC/ST Act Hazaribag in A.B.P. No. 378 of 2025 arising out of Ichak P.S. Case No. 136 of 2024 registered for the offence under Section 126(2), 115(2),117(2), 352, 351(2), 79, 74, 3(5) of the BNS, 2023 and Section 3(1)(s) of the SC/ST Act where the prayer for anticipatory bail of the appellants has been rejected.
2. Learned counsel for the State has submitted that the investigation is complete and cognizance has also been taken by the learned Trial Court.
3. In that view of the matter, learned counsel for the appellants seeks permission to withdraw the present appeal for appearance in the pending proceeding before the learned Trial Court.
4. Permission is accorded.
5. Accordingly, the present criminal appeal stands disposed of.
6. Consequently, I.A. No.6339 of 2026 seeking condonation of delay also stands disposed of.
(Rajesh Kumar, J.) 17 .09.2026 A. Mohanty
Uploaded ____/____/2026