Jharkhand High Court
Cont.(Cvl)/286/2019 of PANKAJ KUMAR Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 16 September 2026
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Cvl.) No.286 of 2019 ------ Pankaj Kumar, aged about 41 years, Son of Parasnath Singh, Resident of Village-Mani Sirisian, P.O.-Husepur, P.S.-Amnaur, District-Chhapra (Bihar). …. …. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of
2026:JHHC:28028
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cont. Case (Cvl.) No.286 of 2019
------
Pankaj Kumar, aged about 41 years, Son of Parasnath Singh, Resident of Village-Mani Sirisian, P.O.-Husepur, P.S.-Amnaur, District-Chhapra (Bihar).
…. ….
Petitioner
Versus
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The State of Jharkhand.
2. Sri Kamal Kishore Sone, The Principal Secretary, Road Construction Department, Government of Jharkhand, Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. + P.S.-Dhurwa, District-Ranchi.
..... .... Opp. Parties
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD
For the Petitioner : Mr. Abhishek Sharan, Advocate
For O.P. No.2 : Mr. Anuj Burman, AC to GA-IV
------
11/Dated: 16.09.2026
1. Learned counsel appearing for the opposite party no.2 by placing an order dated 15.09.2026 as contained in office order no.83 issued under the signature of Superintending Engineer, Road Construction Department, Road Circle, Ranchi has submitted that the petitioner has been appointed.
2. Upon this, Mr. Abhishek Sharan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has joined in pursuant to the office order no.83 dated 15.09.2026.
3. This Court, considering the aforesaid fact, is of the view that the order has been complied with, therefore, there is no need to proceed further.
4. Accordingly, the instant contempt case is closed and as such, disposed of.
5. Let the copy of office order no.83 dated 15.09.2026 be kept on record.
(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.) 16.09.2026 Rohit/-