Jharkhand High Court
Acq. App./136/2019 of NAGO DUSADH ALIAS NAGO PASWAN Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 16 September 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Acquittal Appeal (SJ) No. 136 of 2019 ------- Nago Dusadh @ Nago Paswan aged about 56 years son of Chohan Paswan resident of village- Narayanpur, P.O- Jharpo, P.S- Ichak, District- Hazaribag. .... Appellant(s). Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2.
2026:JHHC:28113
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Acquittal Appeal (SJ) No. 136 of 2019
-------
Nago Dusadh @ Nago Paswan aged about 56 years son of Chohan Paswan resident of village- Narayanpur, P.O- Jharpo, P.S- Ichak, District- Hazaribag.
.... Appellant(s).
Versus
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The State of Jharkhand.
2. Ranjeet Rana aged about 30 years son of Lal Muni Rana.
3. Shanti Devi aged about 47 years wife of Taleshwar Rana.
4. Khedan Rana @ Khedan Barhi aged about 90 years son of Jainath Rana.
5. Dewanti Devi aged about 44 years wife of Lal Muni Rana.
6. Bhikhani Devi aged about 80 years wife of Khedan Rana.
7. Urmila Devi aged about 41 years wife of Dilip Rana.
8. Talo Rana aged about 50 years son of Khedan Rana.
9. Dilip Rana aged about 45 years son of Khedan Rana.
10. Anil Rana aged about 28 years son of Talo Rana.
11. Ashok Rana aged about 30 years son of Talo Rana.
12. Sunil Rana aged about 28 years son of Lal Muni Rana.
13. Lal Muni Rana aged about 48 years son of Khedan Rana.
All resident of village- Narayanpur, P.O.- Jharpo, P.S.- Ichak, District- Hazaribag.
… Respondent(s).
-------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR
------ For the Appellant(s) : None For the State : Mr. Shekhar Sinha, APP For the Respondents : Mr. Awnish Shankar, Advocate
------ 10/ 16.09.2026: Last two orders i.e. order dated 22.06.2026 and order dated 13.08.2026 read as under: “08/22.06.2026
As per the Office report, respondent no. 4 and 6 have died during pendency of this appeal.
2. Learned counsel for the appellant pray for adjournment for taking steps for substitution of the said respondents.
3. As prayed for, put up this case after eight weeks. 09/Dated: 13th August, 2026
1. The appeal is not being pursued in right earnest.
2. Still, in the interest of justice, the matter is adjourned to be listed after three weeks at the instance of the appellant.
3. Put up this case after three weeks.”
2. Today, nobody appears on behalf of the appellant to press the present Acquittal Appeal.
3. Accordingly, the present Acquittal Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Rajesh Kumar, J.) 16th September, 2026 Madhav/- Uploaded:24/09/2026