Jharkhand High Court
C.R./48/2025 of SMT. USHA KIRAN Vs ANSHUL DANG on 16 September 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Civil Revision No. 48 of 2025 …. 1. Smt. Usha Kiran, aged about 63 years, wife of Bindeshwari Prasad Singh, resident of HIG, House No. H-37, Argora Housing Colony, P.O. & P.S. – Argora, Ranchi, Jharkhand 2. Bindeshwari Prasad
2026:JHHC:28133
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Civil Revision No. 48 of 2025
….
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Smt. Usha Kiran, aged about 63 years, wife of Bindeshwari Prasad Singh, resident of HIG, House No. H-37, Argora Housing Colony, P.O. & P.S. – Argora, Ranchi, Jharkhand
2. Bindeshwari Prasad Singh, aged about 68 years, Son of Late Chulahan Singh, Resident of HIG House No. H-37 Argora Housing Colony, P.O. & P.S. – Argora, District Ranchi and presently resident of 308, Panchwati Garden, Bariatu Road, P.O. & P.S. Bariatu, District Ranchi, Jharkhand
……Petitioners
Versus
1. Anshul Dang, son of James Peter Dang, resident of Daug Nagar, Dibadih, P.O. and P.S. Doranda, District – Ranchi, Jharkhand
2. The Managing Director, Jharkhand State Housing Board, having Office at Harmu Housing Colony, P.O. Harmu, P.S. – Argora, District Ranchi, Jharkhand,
3. The Estate Manager, Jharkhand State Housing Board, having Office at Harmu Housing Colony, P.O. Harmu, P.S. – Argora, District Ranchi, Jharkhand
4. The Executive Engineer, Ranchi Division, Jharkhand State Housing Board, having Office at Harmu Housing Colony, P.O. Harmu, P.S. – Argora, District Ranchi, Jharkhand
……Opp. Parties
-----
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD
-----
For the Petitioner : None
For the Opp. Party No.1 : Mr. Ravi, Advocate
……
Order No.05/16th September, 2026
1. None appears on behalf of the petitioner. However, learned counsel for the opposite parties is present.
2. Accordingly, the instant Civil Revision No. 48 of 2025 is dismissed for default.
(Sanjay Prasad, J.) Dated 16.09.2026 Nishant/-