Cont.(Cvl)/649/2024 of SAPAN KUMAR ROY Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 16 September 2026

1. Sapan Kumar Roy, s/o Late Rammay Roy aged about 61 residing at C/o Sri J.C. Manjhi New Shadeo Nagar Near OTC Ground, P.O Hehal,& PS-Sukhdeo Nagar, District-Ranchi.

2. Arvind Kumar Sinha, s/o Late Nageshwar Prasad aged about 64, resident of Namkum Road, Doranda, Near Vijay Electricals, P.O & P.S-Doranda, District-Ranchi ........Petitioners

Versus

1. The State of Jharkhand.

2. Smt. Vandana Dadel, W/o not known to the petitioner, Principal Secretary, Department of Forest, Environment and Climate Change, having its office at Nepal House, Doranda, P.O and P.S-Doranda, Dist.-Ranchi.

3. Sri Nand Kishore Singh s/o not known to the petitioner Managing Director-cum-Upper Principal Chief Forest Conservator, JSFDC Ltd. having its office at Road No.5, Ashok Nagar, P.O & P.S-Argora, Dist. Ranchi.

4. Sir Suvendra Kumar, S/o not known to the petitioner, Divisional Manager, Minor Forest Produce Project Division, Jharkhand State Forest Development Corporation Limited also in additional charge of General Manager, Minor Forest Produce Division, Jharkhand State Forest Development Corporation Limited, having its office at Road No.5, Ashok Nagar, P.O and P.S Argora, Dist.-Ranchi. ...... Opposite Parties

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD

For the Petitioner : Mr. Shivam Utkarsh Sahay, Advocate For the OP-State : Mr. Mukul Kumar Singh, AC to GP-III

Order No.05/Dated: 16th September, 2026

1. The present contempt case has been filed alleging wilful and deliberate violation of the order of this Court dated 15.12.2023 passed in W.P(S) No.1939 of 2017 whereby and whereunder a direction has been issued to the concerned respondents (opposite parties herein) to consider the individual case of the petitioners and accordingly pass a reasoned order 2026:JHHC:28041

2

for regularization of their services from the date they have been stopped from working with all consequential benefits.

2. The instant case is listed under the heading for Orders (with defects).

3. It appears from the stamp reporting that the defect no.9 is still surviving, i.e, certified copy of Annex. -8 with AFS of Rs.10/- per page is required.

4. Mr. Shivam Utkarsh Sahay, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners undertakes that he will remove the said defect within a day or two.

5. Let him do so.

6. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners has submitted that the order dated 15.12.2023 passed in W.P(S) No.1939 of 2017, which is the subject matter of the instant contempt petition, is not surviving, since, the same has been set aside by a Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court vide order dated 12.06.2025 passed in L.P.A No.138 of 2024 and analogous cases.

7. A web copy of the order dated 12.06.2025 is produced in the Court.

8. Let the same be taken on record.

9. This Court, considering the aforesaid fact, is dismissing the instant contempt case as the writ Court's order dated 15.12.2023 passed in W.P.(S) No. 1939 of 2017 has been set aside by the Higher Forum vide order dated 12.06.2025 passed in L.P.A. No. 138 of 2024 and analogous cases as referred hereinabove.

10. Office is directed to supply the certified copy of this order after removal of the said defect.

(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.)

Dated:16.09.2026 Sudhir