Jharkhand High Court

Cont.(Cvl)/317/2024 of UPENDRA PRASAD Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 16 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Page 1 of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No. 317 of 2024 ------ Upendra Prasad, aged about 59 years, son of Sri Damodar Prasad, resident of House No. 752, Road No.2 Obaria Road P.O. & P.S. Chutia, District – Ranchi, Jharkhand ... Petitioner Versus

2026:JHHC:28170

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

Cont. Case (Civil) No. 317 of 2024

------

Upendra Prasad, aged about 59 years, son of Sri Damodar Prasad, resident of House No. 752, Road No.2 Obaria Road P.O. & P.S. Chutia, District – Ranchi, Jharkhand

... Petitioner

Versus

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The State of Jharkhand

2. Mr. Rahul Kumar Purwar, son of not known to the petitioner holding the post of Secretary, Department of Higher, Technical Education and Skill Development, having its office at Project Bhawan, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S. – Dhurwa, Ranchi, Jharkhand.

3. Ram Nivas Yadav son of not known to the petitioner holding the post of Director, Department of Higher, Technical Education and Skill Development, Government of Jharkhand, having its office at Project Bhawan, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S. – Dhurwa, Ranchi, Jharkhand.

4. Binod Narayan son of not known to the petitioner holding the post of Registrar, Ranchi University having its office at Ranchi University Compund, Main Road, P.O. – G.P.O. P.S. –Kotwali, Ranchi, Jharkhand. ... Respondents/Opp. Parties

CORAM

: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD

For the Petitioner : Mr. Padmanav Shahdeo, Advocate

For the OP-State : Mr. Indranil Bhaduri, SC-IV

: Mr. Rahul Kamlesh, AC to SC-IV

For the OP-Ranchi Uni. : Mr. Amit Kumar Sinha, Advocate

------

10/Dated: 16th September, 2026 I.A. No. 1983 of 2026:

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner has sought for leave of this Court not to press the instant interlocutory application.

2. As such, the instant interlocutory application being I.A. No. 1983 of

2026:JHHC:28170

2026 is dismissed as not pressed, and as such, disposed of. Cont. Case (Civil) No. 317 of 2024:

3. Mr. Padmanav Shahdeo, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the order has fully been complied with.

4. Since the order has been complied with, this Court is of the view that there is no need to proceed further in the present contempt case.

5. Accordingly, the instant contempt case being Cont. Case (Civil) No. 317 of 2024 is closed, and as such, disposed of.

(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.)

16th September, 2026

Samarth Uploaded on 17.09.2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead