Jharkhand High Court
C.M.P./1010/2026 of NEHA TIWARY ALIAS NEHA KUMARI Vs MANISH KUMAR SHANDLYA on 15 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.M.P. No.1010 of 2026 Neha Tiwary @ Neha Kumari, aged about 32 years, W/o Manish Kumar Shandlya, D/o Din Bandhu Upadhyaya, R/o Nap Tol Office, Binod Nagar, Chiragora, Dhanbad, P.O.+P.S.-Dhanbad, Jharkhand 826001 Current Address R/o-C/o Dinbandhu Upadhyay, New
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
C.M.P. No.1010 of 2026
Neha Tiwary @ Neha Kumari, aged about 32 years, W/o Manish Kumar Shandlya, D/o Din Bandhu Upadhyaya, R/o Nap Tol Office, Binod Nagar, Chiragora, Dhanbad, P.O.+P.S.-Dhanbad, Jharkhand 826001
Current Address R/o-C/o Dinbandhu Upadhyay, New Colony, Hthgarh by pass road, Bandhdih near Dindayal Kaushal Kendra Kunda, P.O.-Karnibag, P.S.-Kundra, Dist. Deoghar, Jharkhand 814143 … Petitioner
Versus
Manish Kumar Shandlya, aged about 34 years, S/o Dayanand Tiwary, R/o behind Shruti Distributor, Kusum Bihar, P.O. Koylanagar, P.S. Saraidhela, Dist.
Dhanbad, Jharkhand
… Opposite Party
----------
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR RAI
-------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Kundan Kumar, Advocate For the Opp. Party :
-----
Order No.02/Dated: 15.09.2026
I.A. No. 2082 of 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This interlocutory application has been preferred under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condoning the delay of 12 days in preferring the instant appeal.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
3. Considering the sufficient cause as has been referred in this interlocutory application, the delay of 12 days in preferring the appeal is, hereby, condoned.
4. Accordingly, I.A. No. 2082 of 2026 stands allowed. C.M.P. No. 1010 of 2026
5. The instant petition has been filed for restoration of First Appeal being, F.A. No. 7695 of 2024 which has been dismissed for default on 01.12.2025 for non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 17th November, 2025.
6. The reason has been assigned in this petition that the Oath Commissioner who had originally signed and verified the affidavits at the time of filing of the appeal was not functioning and was not available in the High Court during the relevant period and, therefore, fresh verification and attestation as required by the Registry could not be obtained within time.
7. It has been submitted that if the First Appeal is not restored to its original file, then the petitioner will suffer an irreparable loss and injury.
8. This Court having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and taking into consideration the reasons assigned in the said paragraph of the instant petition, is of the view that the First Appeal being, F.A. No. 7695 of 2024 is to be restored to its original file, subject to removal of all the defects within two weeks.
9. Considering the aforesaid fact, the instant petition is allowed.
10. F.A. No. 7695 of 2024 is restored to its original file, subject to removal of all the defects within two weeks.
11. Accordingly, C.M.P. No.1010 of 2026 stands disposed of.
(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.)
(Arun Kumar Rai, J.) 15th September, 2026 R.K/Rajnish Uploaded on