Jharkhand High Court

Cr.A(SJ)/891/2026 of DULARI DEVI Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 15 September 2026

Cites 1, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Criminal Appeal (S.J) No.891 of 2026 ---- Dulari Devi, aged about 42 years, wife of Binod Mandal, resident of Village Bhandaro, P.O. and P.S. Dumri, District Giridih (Jharkhand) …. …. Appellant(s) -Versus- 1. The State of Jharkhand 2.

2026:JHHC:27786

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

Criminal Appeal (S.J) No.891 of 2026

----

Dulari Devi, aged about 42 years, wife of Binod Mandal, resident of Village Bhandaro, P.O. and P.S. Dumri, District Giridih (Jharkhand)

….

….

Appellant(s)

-Versus-

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

1

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The State of Jharkhand

2. Arjun Dushad, son of Late Hiraman Paswan, resident of Village Lotiyabad, P.O. Giridih, P.S. Giridih Muffasil, District Giridih( Jharkhand)

…. …. Respondent(s) ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR ----

For the Appellant

: Mr. Sudhir Kumar Roy, Adv.

For the State

: Mr. Sardhu Mahto, A.P.P.

----

02/Dated: 15th September, 2026

1. The present criminal appeal has been filed against the order dated 10.03.2026, passed by the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-1-cum-Special Judge, SC/ST (PoA), Giridih, in A.B.P No.159 of 2026, whereby the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the appellant has been rejected in connection with SC/ST (Complaint) Case No.15 of 2023, arising out of SC/ST P.S. Case No.11 of 2020, registered for the offence under Sections 147, 149, 447, 341, 323, 385, 504, 506, 467, 468, 471, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3(f)(r)(s) of the SC/ ST (POA) Act, pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-1-cum-Special Judge, SC/ST (PoA), Giridih.

2. In view of the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Musheer Alam Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Anr., reported in 2025 SCC OnLine SC 116, learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission to withdraw the present criminal appeal as after completion of investigation, charge-sheet has been submitted and cognizance has also been taken against the appellant by the Court below.

3. Learned counsel for the State has no objection.

4. Permission is granted. Accordingly, the present criminal appeal is, hereby, dismissed as withdrawn.

5. Pending interlocutory application, if any, also stands disposed of.

(Rajesh Kumar, J.) Dated: 15th September, 2026 Raja/- Uploaded

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead