Jharkhand High Court
Cr.A(DB)/814/2026 of RAVI BHUIYAN ALIAS ROHIT JEE ALIAS NATTU BHARTI ALIAS SANTOSH BHUIYAN ALIAS NATTU BHUIYAN Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 15 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal (D.B) No.814 of 2026 Ravi Bhuiyan @ Rohit Jee @ Nattu Bharti @ Santosh Bhuiyan @ Nattu Bhuiyan @ Rohit @ Nattu, Aged about 46 years, Son of Jagsu Bhuiyan @ Jhaksu Bharti, Resident of Village Badhar, P.O. & P.S. Kunda, District- Chatra …
2026:JHHC:27898-DB
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr. Appeal (D.B) No.814 of 2026
Ravi Bhuiyan @ Rohit Jee @ Nattu Bharti @ Santosh Bhuiyan @ Nattu Bhuiyan @ Rohit @ Nattu, Aged about 46 years, Son of Jagsu Bhuiyan @ Jhaksu Bharti, Resident of Village Badhar, P.O. & P.S. Kunda, District- Chatra
… Appellant
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
… Respondent
----------
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR RAI
-------
For the Appellant : Mr. Anupam Anand, Advocate
Mr. Pranav Kumar, Advocate
For the State
: Mrs. Kumari Rashmi, A.P.P.
-----
Order No.04/Dated: 15.09.2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The instant appeal has been filed under Section 21(4) of the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 against the order dated 14.05.2026 passed in Miscellaneous Criminal Application No. 647 of 2026 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-III, Chatra in connection with S.T. Case No. 236 of 2022 arising out of Kunda P.S. Case No. 11 of 2022.
2. The affidavit in terms of the order dated 07.09.2026 has been filed stating inter alia therein that all the witnesses have been examined.
3. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant has submitted that since all the witnesses have been examined and, as such, the learned trial court may be directed to dispose of the case.
2026:JHHC:27898-DB
4. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
5. Considering the fact that all the witnesses have already been examined and, as such, at this stage no interference is required in the order dated 14.05.2026 by which the prayer for bail of the appellant has been refused to be allowed.
6. Accordingly, the instant appeal is dismissed.
7. Since, all the witnesses have already been examined and, as such, the trial court is to dispose of the case, expeditiously. So far as the later part of the order dated 07.09.2026 seeking report from
The Secretary, Department of Home, Jail and Disaster Management, Govt. of Jharkhand, (2) the Director General of Police, Govt. of Jharkhand and (3) S.P., Chatra is concerned, a similar order has been passed by this Court in Cr. Appeal (D.B) No.727 of 2026.
8. For the aforesaid purpose, let this case be listed alongwith Cr. Appeal (D.B) No.727 of 2026 on 01st October, 2026.
(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.)
(Arun Kumar Rai, J.) 15th September, 2026 R.K/Rajnish Uploaded on