Jharkhand High Court
Cr.M.P./2338/2026 of ALISHA KHALKHO Vs STATE OF JHARKHAND on 15 September 2026
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P (DB) No. 2338 of 2026 --------- 1. Alisha Khalkho, aged about 35 years, daughter of Shri Jiwel Khalkho and wife of Raju @ Eshad Mir 2. Raju @ Eshad Mir, aged about 39 years, son of Shri Abid Mir both are residents of village- Malgo,
2026:JHHC:27908-DB
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr.M.P (DB) No. 2338 of 2026
---------
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Alisha Khalkho, aged about 35 years, daughter of Shri Jiwel Khalkho and wife of Raju @ Eshad Mir
2. Raju @ Eshad Mir, aged about 39 years, son of Shri Abid Mir both are residents of village- Malgo, P.O. and P.S. Bharno, District- Gumla
... … Petitioners
Versus The State of Jharkhand
... … Opp. Party
--------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR RAI
---------
For the Petitioners :Mr. A.K. Sahani, Advocate For the Opp. Party :Mr. Prabhu Dayal Agrawal, Spl.P.P.
---------
06/15.09.2026 Heard Mr. A.K. Sahani, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Spl.P.P. for the State.
In this Petition, the petitioners have prayed for quashing the order dated 29.04.2026 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gumla, in AHTU P.S. Case No. 01 of 2024, whereby and whereunder the process under Section 82 Cr.P.C. has been issued.
It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the impugned order dated 29.04.2026 does not contain any reasons and the same is cryptic and, therefore, is liable to be set aside.
Learned Spl.P.P. has opposed the prayer made in this petition.
It appears on a perusal of the order dated 29.04.2026 that the same does not contain any subjective satisfaction and is merely a reiteration of the application preferred by the Investigating Officer for issuance of process under Section 82 Cr.P.C.
In view of the above, therefore, the impugned order dated 29.04.2026 passed by the learned CJM,
2026:JHHC:27908-DB
Gumla, in connection with AHTU Gumla P.S. Case No. 01/2024 is hereby quashed and set aside.
This petition is allowed and disposed of accordingly.
(Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.)
(Arun Kumar Rai, J.)
15.09.2026 Umesh-Abhishek/-