Jharkhand High Court
Cont.(Cvl)/409/2026 of ASHISH KUMAR Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 11 September 2026
THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No.409 of 2026 Ashish Kumar, aged about 35 years, S/o Raghunath Prasad, Resident of House No.812, Irgu Road, Lorick Mistry Lane, Pahari Tal, Kumhar Toli, P.O – G.P.O., P.S. - Sukhdeo Nagar, District – Ranchi, 834001
2026:JHHC: 27354
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cont. Case (Civil) No.409 of 2026
Ashish Kumar, aged about 35 years, S/o Raghunath Prasad, Resident of House No.812, Irgu Road, Lorick Mistry Lane, Pahari Tal, Kumhar Toli, P.O – G.P.O., P.S. - Sukhdeo Nagar, District – Ranchi, 834001 (Jharkhand).
…… Petitioner
Versus
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. State of Jharkhand.
2. Rajneesh Karnatak, The Managing Director & Chief Executive Officer cum Chief Manager, Bank of India, having its office at Bank of India Head Office, Star house, C-5, “G” Block, Bandra Kurla Complex, P.O – Bandra (East), P.S. - BKC, District – Mumbai 400051 (Maharashtra).
3. Manish Ekka, aged about 38 years, son of Late Nirmal Ekka, Chief Manager & Authorized Officer, Bank of India, having its office at Birsa Raj Marg (Vip Road), Near Sahjanand Chowk, Harmu Housing Colony, Ranchi, P.O. - Harmu Colony, P.S. - Argora, District – Ranchi, 834012 (Jharkhand) …... Opp. Parties --------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Salona Mittal, Advocate Ms. Lavanya G. Mittal, Advocate Mr. Yashdeep Kanhai, Advocate For the O.Ps. : Mr. Rohit Ranjan Sinha, Advocate Ms. Chanchal Verma, Advocate Mr. Shubham Kumar, Advocate --------
06/Dated: 11
th September, 2026
1. The present contempt petition has been filed for initiation of contempt proceeding against the alleged contemnors/ opposite parties for non-compliance of the order dated 24.02.2026, passed by this Court in W.P.(C) No.4448 of 2025.
2. It has been submitted by learned counsel for both the parties that the order dated 24.02.2026 has already been complied with.
3. In view of above submission, the present contempt petition is, hereby, closed.
4. Pending, interlocutory application, if any, stands disposed of.
(Rajesh Kumar, J.) 11th September, 2026 Chandan/- Uploaded on 14.09.2026