Jharkhand High Court
Cr.A(DB)/1076/2026 of MUKESH RAM @ AZAD @ RAVI @ KULLU Vs STATE OF JHARKHAND on 11 September 2026
Citation 2026:JHHC:27340-DB 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 1076 of 2026 Mukesh Ram @ Azad @ Ravi @ Kullu, S/o Late Nanhaku Ram, R/o Vill- Purani Palheya, P.O.- Palheya, P.S.- Manika, Dist.- Latehar. --- --- Appellant Versus State of Jharkhand --- --- Respondent ---
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Neutral Citation 2026:JHHC:27340-DB
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 1076 of 2026
Mukesh Ram @ Azad @ Ravi @ Kullu, S/o Late Nanhaku Ram, R/o Vill- Purani Palheya, P.O.- Palheya, P.S.- Manika, Dist.- Latehar.
--- ---
Appellant Versus State of Jharkhand
--- --- Respondent --- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR RAI --- For the Appellant : Mr. Ashok Kumar, Adv. For the State
: P.P.
---
02/11.09.2026 Heard Mr. Ashok Kumar, learned counsel for the appellant and learned P.P.
This appeal is directed against the order dated 28.07.2026 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, Latehar in Misc. Criminal Application No. 567/2026 in connection with Manika P.S. Case No. 123/2021, whereby and whereunder, the prayer for bail of the appellant has been rejected.
It has been alleged that on an information, a raid was carried out in the forest near village Barvaiya and on a search can bombs etc. were recovered.
Submission has been advanced by learned counsel for the appellant that admittedly no extremist was found at the place of occurrence. It has been submitted that it is the villagers who had named the appellant and other accused persons of being involved in planting bombs. Learned counsel submits that the appellant is in custody since 24.09.2025.
Learned P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail of the appellant and has submitted that the appellant has got several criminal antecedents.
Neutral Citation 2026:JHHC:27340-DB
Regard being had to the fact that the appellant seems to have been implicated primarily on the basis of suspicion, we while setting aside the order dated 28.07.2026 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, Latehar in Misc. Criminal Application No. 567/2026 in connection with Manika P.S. Case No. 123/2021, direct that the appellant be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, Latehar in connection with Manika P.S. Case No. 123/2021.
This appeal is allowed.
(Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.)
(Arun Kumar Rai, J.) Dated- 11th September, 2026. Preet/- Uploaded on: 14 /09/2026.