Jharkhand High Court
Acq. App./30/2024 of THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH DEPUTY COMMISSIONER WEST SINGHBHUM Vs KANHU SOREN ALIAS KARAN on 11 September 2026
Citation No. ( 2026:JHHC:27329-DB ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Acquittal Appeal (D.B.) No. 30 of 2024 --- State of Jharkhand through Deputy Commissioner, Chaibasa, West Singhbhum … … Appellant Versus Kanhu Soren @ Karan … … Respondent --- CORAM: HON'BLE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Neutral Citation No. ( 2026:JHHC:27329-DB )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Acquittal Appeal (D.B.) No. 30 of 2024
---
State of Jharkhand through Deputy Commissioner, Chaibasa, West Singhbhum
… … Appellant
Versus Kanhu Soren @ Karan
… … Respondent
---
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY
: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR RAI
---
For the Appellant : Mr. Bhola Nath Ojha, Special P.P.
For the Respondent : Mr. N. K. Sahani, Advocate
---
8/11.09.2026 I. A. No. 3480 of 2024: Heard Mr. B. N. Ojha, learned Special P.P. appearing for the appellant and Mr. N. K. Sahani, learned counsel for the respondent. This interlocutory application has been preferred by the appellant for condoning the delay of 654 days in filing this acquittal appeal. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the appellant that after the opinion was given by the Public Prosecutor, West Singhbhum, Chaibasa, the file was sent to the Deputy Commissioner, West Singhbhum, Chaibasa and thereafter to the office of the Advocate General which after which memo of appeal was drafted and the present appeal has been filed. Mr. N. K. Sahani, learned counsel for the respondent has submitted that though the judgment of acquittal was passed on 01.04.2021, but the Public Prosecutor, West Singhbhum, Chaibasa had written a letter to the Deputy Commissioner, West Singhbhum, Chaibasa only on 04.11.2023 opining to prefer an appeal against the said judgment. From the averments made in the instant application, it appears that the reasons for the delay have been given post the letter dated 04.11.2023 and there is no explanation with respect to the delay of two and half years in giving of the opinion by the learned Public Prosecutor to the Deputy Commissioner for filing an appeal. The judgment of acquittal
-2- was passed on 01.04.2021 and the letter of Public Prosecutor was given on 04.11.2023 and in absence of there being any reason for such delay, we are not inclined to condone the delay of 654 days in preferring the appeal. This interlocutory application stands rejected and consequently Acquittal Appeal (D.B.) No. 30 of 2024 also stands dismissed.
(Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.)
(Arun Kumar Rai, J.) 11 September 2026 Uploaded R. Shekhar Cp 3