Jharkhand High Court

W.P.(Cr.)/493/2026 of DAVID KACHHAP Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 11 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Page 1 of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (HB)(Cr.)(DB) No. 493 of 2026 ------ David Kachhap aged about 62 years son of Late Lawrence Kachhap resident of Naya Toli Pandra P.O. Hehal, P.S. Sukhdevnagar (Pandra O.P.) District Ranchi 834005 Aadhar No. xxxx-xxxx-xxxx Mob.

2026:JHHC:27501-DB

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

W.P. (HB)(Cr.)(DB) No. 493 of 2026

------

David Kachhap aged about 62 years son of Late Lawrence Kachhap resident of Naya Toli Pandra P.O. Hehal, P.S. Sukhdevnagar (Pandra O.P.) District Ranchi 834005 Aadhar No. xxxx-xxxx-xxxx Mob.

76777*****

… Petitioner

Versus

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The State of Jharkhand

2. The Officer In-charge P.S. Pandra District Ranchi

3. Dr. Rev Roshan Massih, aged about 42 yrs S/o not known, C/o Vishwambhar Digambar Shelake, Shelka layout, ward no. 1, ta mehkar, Vivekanand Nagar, Buldhana, Maharashtra PIN 443301

… Respondents

CORAM

: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA

For the Petitioner : Mr. Abhishek Sharan, Advocate

For the State

: Mr. Shubham Gautam, AC to Sr. AAG

------

03/Dated: 11th September, 2026

1. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the prayer made in the instant petition is having no force as of now, as such, he does not intend to press the same.

2. Such submission has been made by the learned counsel on the instruction received from his client.

3. The aforesaid submissions have been made in the presence of learned State counsel.

4. Learned counsel representing the State has submitted that the corpus has been recovered and she herself has returned to her house.

2026:JHHC:27501-DB

5. Considering the prayer so made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the instant writ petition being W.P.(HB)(Cr.)(DB) No. 493 of 2026 is dismissed as not pressed, and as such, disposed of.

(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.)

(Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.)

11th September, 2026 Samarth Uploaded on 15.09.2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead