Jharkhand High Court
LPA/124/2026 of JHARKHAND STATE HOUSING BOARD, THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR Vs SATISH KUMAR VERMA on 11 September 2026
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI L.P.A. No.124 of 2026 ------ 1. Jharkhand State Housing Board through its Managing Director, Harmu Housing Colony, P.O & P.S: Harmu, District: Ranchi 2. Revenue Officer, Jharkhand State Housing Board, Harmu Housing Colony, P.O & P.S:
2026:JHHC:27505-DB
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
L.P.A. No.124 of 2026
------
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Jharkhand State Housing Board through its Managing Director, Harmu Housing Colony, P.O & P.S: Harmu, District: Ranchi
2. Revenue Officer, Jharkhand State Housing Board, Harmu Housing Colony, P.O & P.S: Harmu, District: Ranchi.
3. Estate Officer, Jharkhand State Housing Board, Harmu Housing Colony, P.O & P.S: Harmu, District: Ranchi.
4. Executive Engineer, Jharkhand State Housing Board, Harmu Housing Colony, P.O & P.S: Harmu, District: Ranchi.
5. Secretary, Jharkhand State Housing Board, Harmu Housing Colony, P.O & P.S: Harmu, District: Ranchi.
…. …. Appellants
Versus
1. Satish Kumar Verma, S/o Sudarshan Verma, R/o Road No.4, Kishore Ganj, Harmu Housing Colony, P.O: Harmu, P.S: Sukhdevnagar, District: Ranchi.
2. The State of Jharkhand through its Secretary, Urban Development and Housing Department, Government of Jharkhand, Project Building, P.O: Dhurwa, P.S: Jagannathpur, District-Ranchi.
..... .... Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
For the Appellants : None
For Resp. No.1 : Mr. Afaque Ahmad, Advocate
------
03/Dated: 11.09.2026
1. After waiting for a considerable time, none is present to represent the appellants.
2. Accordingly, the instant appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.)
(Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.) 11.09.2026 Rohit/-