Jharkhand High Court
B.A./2475/2026 of ANISH TIRKEY Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 11 September 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 2475 of 2026 ---- Anish Tirkey, aged about 19 years, S/o Seva Samir Tirkey, R/o Village-Malar, PO + PS-Itki, Dist.-Ranchi …. …. Petitioner(s)/Applicant(s) Versus The State of Jharkhand …. …. Opposite Party ----
2026:JHHC:27362
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 2475 of 2026
----
Anish Tirkey, aged about 19 years, S/o Seva Samir Tirkey, R/o Village-Malar, PO
+ PS-Itki, Dist.-Ranchi
….
….
Petitioner(s)/Applicant(s)
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
….
….
Opposite Party
----
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR
----
For the Petitioner(s)/Applicant(s)
: Mr. Avishek Prasad, Adv.
Mr. R.P. Gupta, Adv.
For the State
: Mr. Saket Kumar, A.P.P.
----
07/Dated: 11.09.2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel for the State.
2. The applicant, who is in custody since 23.07.2025 has approached this Court for grant of regular bail in connection with Itki P.S. Case No. 54 of 2025, converted into S.T. No. 60 of 2026 registered for the offence under Sections 103(1), 115(2), 127(1), 117(2), 3(5) of the BNS, 2023, pending in the court of learned AJC-V, Ranchi.
3. Earlier the prayer for bail of this applicant has been dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 17.02.2026 passed by this Court in B.A. No. 10603 of 2025.
4. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant(s) that complete set of FIR along with its enclosure have been annexed with this bail application and there is no suppression on his/her part.
5. Innocence has been claimed by the learned counsel for the applicant and undertaking has been given for participation in the trial. It has been submitted that the allegation against this applicant is all false and frivolous. Sanicharwa Lakra, the deceased was a mentally disturbed person and he tried to break open the door of the house of the applicant in the night and when the applicant woke up, he pounced upon him and to save himself, he assaulted the deceased. It has further been submitted that this is at best a case of exceeding the right of private defence. Further, the applicant has no intention to kill the deceased and he has been roped only on the basis of confession made before the police by his father. He has no
2026:JHHC:27362
2 B.A. No. 2475 of 2026 criminal antecedent and further, not a single witness has been examined till date. On the above basis, prayer for bail has been made.
6. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail.
7. Considering the above facts, I am inclined to enlarge the applicant on bail. Accordingly, the applicant, named above, is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned AJC-V, Ranchi in connection with Itki P.S. Case No. 54 of 2025, (S.T. No. 60 of 2026), subject to condition that the applicant(s) will submit self-attested photocopy/photocopies of his/her/their Aadhaar Card(s) and also submit his/her/their mobile number(s) before the learned Trial Court which he/she/they will always keep active and will not change it during pendency of this case without prior permission of the court.
(Rajesh Kumar, J.)
Dated 11.09. 2026 Pawan/Uploaded 14.09.2026