Jharkhand High Court
B.A./3688/2026 of VIKASH GANJHU @ DASHRATH GANJHU Vs STATE OF JHARKHAND on 11 September 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 3688 of 2026 ---- Vikash Ganjhu @ Dashrath Ganjhu, aged about 41 years, Son of Late Ramdeo Ganjhu, resident of Village Ekta, P.O. & P.S. Kunda, District Chatra (Jharkhand) …. …. Petitioner(s)/Applicant(s) -Versus- The
2026:JHHC:27367
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 3688 of 2026
----
Vikash Ganjhu @ Dashrath Ganjhu, aged about 41 years, Son of Late Ramdeo Ganjhu, resident of Village Ekta, P.O. & P.S. Kunda, District Chatra (Jharkhand)
….
….
Petitioner(s)/Applicant(s)
-Versus-
The State of Jharkhand
….
….
Opposite Party
----
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR
----
For the Petitioner(s)/Applicant(s)
: Mr. Harsh Vardhan, Adv.
For the State
: Mrs. Anuradha Sahay, A.P.P.
----
05/Dated: 11th September, 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. On the instruction of his client, learned counsel for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw the present bail application.
2. Learned counsel for the State has raised no objection.
3. Permission is granted. Accordingly, the present bail application stands dismissed as withdrawn.
(Rajesh Kumar, J.)
Dated 11th September, 2026 Raja/Uploaded