Jharkhand High Court
Cr.A(DB)/973/2026 of SHIV KUMAR SINGH @ TINKU SINGH Vs STATE OF JHARKHAND on 10 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal (D.B) No.973 of 2026 Shiv Kumar Singh @ Tinku Singh … Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand … Respondent ---------- Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR RAI ------- For the Appellant
2026:JHHC:27204-DB
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr. Appeal (D.B) No.973 of 2026
Shiv Kumar Singh @ Tinku Singh … Appellant
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
… Respondent
----------
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR RAI
-------
For the Appellant : Mr. Pradyot Chatterjee, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shiv Shankar Kumar, A.P.P.
-----
Order No.03/Dated: 10.09.2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Mr. Pradyot Chatterjee, learned counsel for the appellant and learned A.P.P.
2. This appeal is directed against the order dated 01.07.2026 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Dhanbad in B.P. No.469 of 2026 arising out of Dhanbad P.S. Case No. 158 of 2026, whereby and whereunder the prayer for bail of the appellant has been rejected.
3. It has been alleged that on 11.05.2026 a powerful explosion had taken place in a house at Thakurkulhi and a person had suffered severe injuries. When the police reached the place of occurrence, the appellant was found to be the person who had suffered injuries on account of a bomb having blasted and which was being prepared by the appellant.
4. Submission has been advanced by the learned counsel for the appellant that the appellant is in custody since 25.05.2026. It has further been submitted that though there is one antecedent against the appellant 2026:JHHC:27204-DB
under Section 302/201/34 I.P.C. but in the said case the appellant has already been acquitted.
5. Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail of the appellant.
6. Regard being had to the period of custody undergone by the appellant and the fact that on account of making of bomb the appellant also had suffered severe injuries, we while setting aside the order dated 01.07.2026 passed in B.P. No.469 of 2026 arising out of Dhanbad P.S. Case No. 158 of 2026 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Dhanbad direct that the appellant be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dhanbad in connection with Dhanbad P.S. Case No. 158 of 2026.
7. This appeal is allowed.
(Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.)
(Arun Kumar Rai, J.) 10th September, 2026 R.K/Rajnish Uploaded on