Jharkhand High Court
Cr.A(SJ)/727/2026 of BIKRAM KUMHAR MAHTO ALIAS VIKRAM KUMAR Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 10 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal (S.J.) No. 727 of 2026 ------ 1. Bikram Kumhar Mahto @ Vikram Kumar, aged about 30 years, S/o Paras Nath Mahto, R/o Village Gagi, P.O. Gagi, P.S. Kanke, Dist.- Ranchi 2. Maha Nand Kumhar Mahto @ Mahanand Kumar Mahto, aged about 26 years, S/o Krishna
2026:JHHC:27225
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr. Appeal (S.J.) No. 727 of 2026
------
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Bikram Kumhar Mahto @ Vikram Kumar, aged about 30 years, S/o Paras Nath Mahto, R/o Village Gagi, P.O. Gagi, P.S. Kanke, Dist.- Ranchi
2. Maha Nand Kumhar Mahto @ Mahanand Kumar Mahto, aged about 26 years, S/o Krishna Kumar Mahto, R/o Village Gagi, P.O. Gagi, P.S. Kanke, Dist.-Ranchi
3. Mukul Kumhar Mahto @ Mukul Mahto, aged about 50 years, aged about Jitbahan Mahto, R/o Kumhar Tola Gagi, P.O. Gagi, P.S. Kanke, Dist.-Ranchi
4. Heera Lohra @ Hira Lal Lohra, aged about 31 years, S/o Kallu Lohra, R/o Village Sukurhuttu, P.O. Sukurhuttu, P.S. Kanke, Dist.-Ranchi
.... .... …. Appellant(s)
Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand
2. Pradeep Munda, S/o Jaipal Munda, R/o Village Gagi, P.O. & P.S. Kanke, Dist.-Ranchi .... .... .... Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR
For the Appellant(s) : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Adv.
Ms. Neelam Kumari, Adv.
For the State
: Mr. Pankaj Kumar, P.P.
------
Order No.02/Dated : 10.09.2026
1. Learned counsel for the appellants seeks permission to withdraw the present appeal with a liberty to file fresh one.
2. Learned counsel for the State has raised no objection.
3. Permission is accorded.
4. Accordingly, this appeal is, hereby, dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
5. Interlocutory application being I.A. No. 10422 of 2026 in limitation matter, also stands disposed of.
(Rajesh Kumar, J.) 10.09.2026 Pawan/ Uploaded on 11.09.2026