Jharkhand High Court
Cr.Rev./426/2018 of PREM JAISUKA Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 9 September 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.Revision No.426 of 2018 -------- Prem Jaisuka, aged about 28 years, S/o late Mohan Lal Jaisuka, R/o Naya Bazar, PO and PS: Jugsalai, District: East Singhbhum, Jharkhand . ... ... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Jagdish Prasad, S/o
2026:JHHC:27005
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr.Revision No.426 of 2018
--------
Prem Jaisuka, aged about 28 years, S/o late Mohan Lal Jaisuka, R/o Naya Bazar, PO and PS: Jugsalai, District: East Singhbhum, Jharkhand . ... ... Petitioner
Versus
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The State of Jharkhand
2. Jagdish Prasad, S/o late Mathura Prasad, R/o Station Road, Loknath Complex, Savita Apartment-4A, PO & PS Jugsalai, District: East Singhbhum, Jharkhand.
… … Opp.Parties
-------- CORAM:HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
-------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Abhijeet Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr.Saket Kumar, APP
-------- Order No.03/ Dated: 9th September, 2026
1. The present criminal revision has been filed against the order dated 24.01.2018 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-IV, Jamshedpur in Misc. Cr. Appeal No. 139/2017 (S.T. No. 158 of 2017), whereby the prayer of the petitioner for discharge in connection with Jugsalai P.S. case no. 348 of 2018, corresponding to G.R. case no. 3588 of 2015 has been rejected.
2. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that now after completion of trial, the case concerned has been disposed of and the petitioner has been acquitted, hence, the present criminal revision has become infructuous.
3. In view of aforesaid facts, the present criminal revision stands dismissed as infructuous.
4. I.A.(s), if any, also disposed of.
(Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.) KNR Uploaded on:09.09.2026