Jharkhand High Court
Cr.A(DB)/1052/2026 of TILOO SAH ALIAS TILU SAH Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 7 September 2026
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 1052 of 2026 --------- Tiloo Sah @ Tilu Sah, aged about 36 years, S/O Shri Rajendra Sah, R/O Mouza Bodbandh, Teli Tola, P.O. and P.S. Barhait, District- Sahibganj ... … Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand ...
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
2026:JHHC:26847-DB
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 1052 of 2026
---------
Tiloo Sah @ Tilu Sah, aged about 36 years, S/O Shri Rajendra Sah, R/O Mouza Bodbandh, Teli Tola, P.O. and P.S. Barhait, District- Sahibganj
... … Appellant
Versus The State of Jharkhand
... … Respondent
--------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR RAI
---------
For the Appellant :Md. Razaullah Ansari, Advocate
For the Res.-State :Mr. Sanjay Kr. Srivastava, A.P.P.
---------
04/07.09.2026 Heard Md. Razaullah Ansari, learned counsel for the appellant and learned A.P.P. for the State.
This appeal is directed against the order dated 18.06.2026 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Sahibganj in Bail Petition No. 154/2026 in connection with Barhait P.S. Case No. 55 of 2026, whereby and whereunder, the prayer for regular bail of the appellant has been rejected.
It has been alleged that the appellant had enticed away the sister of the informant on the promise of providing a job in Kerala.
Submission has been advanced by the learned counsel for the appellant that the victim has returned and her statement has also been recorded by the police. It has been submitted that the appellant is in custody since 24.04.2026 and he does not have any criminal antecedent related to human trafficking. It has further been submitted that the charge sheet has already been submitted by the police.
Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail of the appellant and has referred to paragraph-3 of the case diary, wherein the statement of the victim has been
2026:JHHC:26847-DB
recorded, in which she has stated that she was inclined to go outside and that the appellant, on the pretext of providing a job in Kerala, had taken her to Delhi.
It appears that charge sheet has been submitted by the police and the statement of the victim has also been recorded. The appellant does not have any criminal antecedent with respect to human trafficking.
On consideration of the aforesaid facts and the period of custody undergone by the appellant, we, while setting aside the order dated 18.06.2026 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Sahibganj in Bail Petition No. 154/2026, direct that the appellant be released on bail on furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Sahibganj in connection with Barhait P.S. Case No. 55 of 2026, subject to the condition that appellant shall remain physically present before the learned trial court on each and every date till the conclusion of the trial unless prevented by a sufficient cause.
This appeal stands allowed.
(Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.)
(Arun Kumar Rai, J.)
07.09.2026 Umesh-Abhishek/-