FA/40/2024 of MENKA KUMARI Vs SULABH KUMAR ARUN on 3 September 2026

2026:JHHC:26753-DB

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

F.A. No. 40 of 2024

Menka Kumari, wife of Sulabh Kumar Arun, D/o. R. P. Singh, aged about 44 years, Present residence, R/o. B-72, Kunj Vihar, CGHS, Plot No. 19, Sector 12, Dwarka, Р.О. and P.S. Sector 12, District- Dwarka, New Delhi. Permanent residence, R/o. Qrs. No. 3087, Sector 4F, P.O. and P.S. Sector 4, Bokaro Steel City, District Bokaro (Jharkhand).

….

--- Appellant Versus Sulabh Kumar Arun, Son of Devendra Kumar Arun, Resident of A2, 404, Dwarka Lords Residency, Opposite Dwarkadheesh Apartment, Shivar Chowk, Pimlpe Saudagar, P.O. Saudagar P.S. Saudagar District - Pune (Maharashtra)

.….

--- Respondent

---

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD

---

For the Appellant:

Mr. Kripa Shankar Nanda, Advocate

For the Respondent:

Dr. (Mrs.) Vandana Singh, Advocate

Mr. Vivek Kumar Sharma, Advocate

Ms. Aliza, Advocate

---

13 / 03.09.2026 Per Sujit Narayan Prasad J

The instant appeal is under Section 19 (1) of the Family Courts Act, 1984 preferred by the appellant-wife against the Judgment dated 22.01.2024 and decree dated 03.02.2024 passed by learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Bokaro in Original Suit No. 157 of 2022, whereby and whereunder the marriage in between appellant-wife and respondent-husband has been dissolved.

2. The matter was heard by this Court and admitted for final hearing as per the order dated 5th August, 2024.

3. The matter was sent for mediation as would be evident from the order dated 23rd July, 2026, which is being referred herein:- “1. Mr. K.S. Nanda, learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that the appellant is ready to settle the dispute and as such he has shown his willingness, based upon the instruction of the appellant, that the matter may be referred to JHALSA for mediation.

2. The respondent-husband is being represented by Mrs. Vandana Singh, who is having no objection if the matter is being referred to JHALSA for mediation.

3. Accordingly, with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the parties in person are directed to appear before the Mediator, JHALSA on 29th July, 2025 positively at 11.00 a.m.

4. List this case after four weeks along with the mediation report.

5. List this case on 03.09.2026.”

4. The mediation report has been made available as would be evident from the office note dated 31.08.2026. Mediation report is available at ‘Flag-W’, both the parties have settled their disputes based upon the following terms and conditions. The settlement arrived between the parties, which is in Hindi, is being incorporated herein:- le{k] e/;LFk e/;LFkrk dsUnz] >kylk] jk¡phA

fnukad& 29-7-2026 le;&vig~kj.k 2-00 Pm lanHkZ&% F.A. No. 40 of 2024 esudk dqekjh @ dqekjh esudk -------------------vihykFkhZ cuke “kqyHk dqekj v:.k

------------------izfroknh mijksDr okn la[;k F.A. No. 40 of 2024] e/;LFkrk dsUnz] >kylk] jk¡ph esa fnukad 29-7-26 dks e/;LFkrk gsrq lkSaik x;kA mijksDr nksuksa i{kksa dks e/;LFkrk izØh;k le>k nh xbZA e/;LFkrk ds nkSjku nksuksa i{kksa ds chp dbZ fodYi vk,A nksuksa] i{k fuEufyf[kr fcanqvksa ij vkil esa le>kSrk djus gsrq rS;kj gq, &% 1- ;g fd mijksDr okn f}rh; i{k dks izkIr fookn&foPNsn fMØh ds fo:) yk;k x;k gSA nksuksa i{kx.k esa lgefr cuh fd mijksDr izkIr fookn&foPNsn fMØh dks Lohdkj djsaxsaA 2- ;g fd oSokfgd thou ls ,d iq=h ftldk uke “;keyh flag gS tks izFke i{k viuh ek¡ ds lkFk jgsxh] rFkk f}rh; i{k ¼firk½ viuh iq=h ls izR;sd ekg esa nks fnu fey ldrs gSa tks iq=h dh lqfo/kk ds vuqlkj vfxze lwpuk nsdj feysxsaA 3- ;g fd f}rh; i{k }kjk ekuuh; dqVqEc U;k;ky;] cksdkjksa esa nks cSad fMekaM Mªk¶V Rs. 15,00,000/- ,oa Rs. 30,000/- dk tek fd;k gS ftldk D.D. No. 277498 dt 15-4-2024 ,oa D.D. No. 924974 fnukad 16-4-2024 dk tek fd;k gS ekuuh; U;k;ky; ds vns”kkuqlkj ftldh vof/k lekIr gks pqdh gS blfy, f}rh; i{k ds vf/koDrk Jh jkts”k izrki flag nksuksa DD dks okil izkIr djsaxs ftlij izFke i{k dks dksbZ vkifÙk ugha gSA 4- ;g fd mijksDr DD dh jde okil izkIr gksus ds i”pkr]~ vfoyEc mijksDr nksuksa DD dh jde dks izFke i{k ds cSad&,sdkmaV esa RTGS ds }kjk f}rh; i{k vius cSad&,dkmaV ;k vius firk nsosUnz dqekj v:.k ds ,dkmaV ls tek djsaxsA izFke i{k dk cSad ,dkmaV fooj.k %& KUMARI MENKA, Saving Account No. 50100733504226, HDFC, Dwarka Sector II Branch, Delhi IFSC Code HDFC0001338 gSA 5- ;g fd f}rh; i{k viuh csVh Shyamli Singh ds cSad ,dkmaV] Union Bank of India, Dwarka Sector-6, Saving A/c N0 627902010004001, IFSC Code : UBIN0553646 esa Rs. 10,00,000/- ¼nl yk[k½ :i;k vyx ls tek djsaxs] ftldk mi;ksx izFke i{k viuh iq=h ds thou gsrq viuh ethZ ls mi;ksx djsxh ftlij f}rh; i{k dk gLr{ksi ugha jgsxkA 6- ;g fd cdk;k Hkj.k&iks’k.k HkÙkk dk dqy Rs. 3,60,000/- ¼rhu yk[k lkB gtkj½ :i;k tqykbZ 2026 rd dk f}rh; i{k] izFke i{k ds cSad ,dkmaV esa tk,xk tks dafMdk 4 ds vuqlkj RTGS ds }kjk tek gksxkA 7- ;g fd f}rh; i{k viuh iq=h ds ckfyd gksus rd izR;sd ekg Rs. 15,000/- ¼ianzkgk gtkj½ :i;k] izR;sd ekg dh nl rkjh[k rd] izFke i{k ds cSad ,dkmaV dafMdk&4 esa mYysf[kr ,adkmV esa tek djsaxsA 8- ;g fd mijksDr mYysf[kr jde dks izkIr djus ds i”pkr~ izFke i{k mijksDr okn dks okil ysxh rFkk O;ogkj U;k;ky;] cksdkjks] QSeyh dksVZ ds okn la[;k Original Suit No. 157/2022 esa ikfjr oSokfgd foPNsn vkns”k ,oa fMØh dks Lohdkj djsxhA

9- ;g fd fookg&foPNsn fMØh dks Lohdkj djus i”pkr~ nksuksa i{kx.k viuk&viuk thou viuh ethZ ls O;frr djsaxsA fdlh dk ,d&nqljs ds thou esa gLr{ksi ugha jgsxkA 10- ;g fd nksuksa i{kksa ds ikl oSokfgd thou ls lacaf/kr dksbZ nLrkost ;k QksVks bR;kfn gksxk rks mldk nq:I;ksx ugha djsaxs rFkk fdlh vU; O;fDr ds lkFk lk{kk ugha djsaxsA 11- ;g fd nksuksa i{k mijksDr of.kZr “krksZa dks vPNh rjg ls le{kdj] fcuk fdlh Hk;&ncko ds ;g le>kSrk dj jgs gSa rFkk i<+dj viuk&viuk gLrk{kj e/;LFk ds le{k] viuh LosPNk ls fd, gSaA Sd/-

Sd/-

21/7/2026

29/7/26 izFke i{k dk gLrk{kj f}rh; i{k dk gLrk{kj

29-7-26 e/;LFk

5. Mr. Kripa Shankar Nanda, learned counsel appearing for the appellant in view of the settlement having been arrived in between the appellant-wife and the respondent-husband has submitted that he is not pressing the instant appeal.

6. Accordingly, the instant appeal is dismissed as not pressed and as such disposed of based upon the settlement arrived between the parties as quoted and referred here-in-above.

(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.)

(Sanjay Prasad, J.) Date: 03.09.2026 RKM