Jharkhand High Court
Cr.M.P./2689/2026 of ANAND MANDAL @ ANANDO MANDAL Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 2 September 2026
Citation No. ( 2026:JHHC:26398-DB ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. (DB) No. 2689 of 2026 Anand Mandal @ Anando Mandal, son of Late Sudhir Mandal, resident of village: Tapuwa Janighat, PO & PS: Rajmahal, District: Sahibganj, Jharkhand. ... Petitioner Versus The State of
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Neutral Citation No. ( 2026:JHHC:26398-DB )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr.M.P. (DB) No. 2689 of 2026
Anand Mandal @ Anando Mandal, son of Late Sudhir Mandal, resident of village: Tapuwa Janighat, PO & PS: Rajmahal, District: Sahibganj, Jharkhand.
... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
… Opposite Party
---
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR RAI
For the Petitioner : Mr. Sudhanshu Shekhar Choudhary, Advocate For the State : Spl.P.P.
---
02/02.09.2026
Heard Mr. Sudhanshu Shekhar Choudhary, the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Spl.P.P.
In this application, the petitioner has prayed for quashing of the orders dated 29.07.2026 and 12.08.2026, passed in connection with Rajmahal P.S. Case No. 229/2026, by the learned SDJM, Rajmahal, whereby and whereunder, non-bailable warrant of arrest and proclamation under section 84 of BNSS have been issued.
Submission has been advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner primarily focusing on the order dated 12.08.2026 that the same does not contain justifiable reasons and has merely taken note of the application submitted by the Investigating Officer for issuance of proclamation under section 84 of BNSS.
Learned Spl.P.P. has opposed the prayer made in this application.
The impugned order dated 12.08.2026 does indicate that no subjective satisfaction has been recorded by the learned SDJM, Rajmahal while issuing proclamation under section 84 of BNSS and consequently, the same is hereby quashed and set aside.
This application stands allowed to the extent mentioned hereinabove.
(RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY, J.)
(ARUN KUMAR RAI, J.) 02.09.2026 S.B. Uploaded on 03.09.2026