Jharkhand High Court
Cont.(Cvl)/709/2026 of SHIV PRAKASH DUBEY Vs STATE OF JHARKHAND on 1 September 2026
Page 1 of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No. 709 of 2026 ------ Shiv Prakash Dubey @ Sheo Prakash Dubey, aged about 60 years, S/o – Late Chandra Bhushan Dubey, R/o – Cheshire Home Road, Bariatu, P.O. & P.S. – Bariatu, Dist. –
2026:JHHC:26591-DB
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cont. Case (Civil) No. 709 of 2026
------
Shiv Prakash Dubey @ Sheo Prakash Dubey, aged about 60 years, S/o –
Late Chandra Bhushan Dubey, R/o – Cheshire Home Road, Bariatu, P.O.
& P.S. – Bariatu, Dist. – Ranchi
... Petitioner
Versus
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. State of Jharkhand.
2. Rajeev Kumar S/o not known, Superintendent of Police, CBI, having its office at Morabadi, P.O. Morabadi, P.S. Kotwali, Dist. Ranchi.
... Opp. Parties
CORAM
: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD
For the Petitioner : Mr. Shailesh Kumar Singh, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Mukul Kumar Singh, AC to GP-III
For the CBI
: Mr. Prashant Pallav, ASGI
: Mr. Ayush, AC to ASGI
------
03/Dated: 1st September, 2026
1. Heard Mr. Shailesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner & Mr. Prashant Pallav, learned Additional Solicitor General of India for the Opp. Party-CBI.
2. Mr. Shailesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, after some argument, seeks leave of this Court not to press the instant contempt case with the liberty to search out the remedy as available in law for redressal of his grievance.
3. There is no opposition by the learned Additional Solicitor General of India for the same.
4. Accordingly, the instant contempt case being Cont. Case (Civil) No. 709 of 2026 stands dismissed as withdrawn, and as such, disposed
2026:JHHC:26591-DB
of, however, with the liberty to search out the remedy as available in law for redressal of the grievance.
(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.)
(Sanjay Prasad, J.)
1st September, 2026 Samarth Uploaded on _____________