Jharkhand High Court
Cr.A(DB)/918/2026 of SISHEELIYA KACHHAP @ ANJALI KACHHAP Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 1 September 2026
Page 1 of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 918 of 2026 Sisheeliya Kachhap @ Anjali Kachhap, aged about 42 years, Wife of Nirmal Sameer Kachhap, Resident of 19, Agahapur, Sector-41, Noida, P.O.- Noida Sector-41 Sub post office & P.S.- Gautam Budda
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
( 2026:JHHC:26359-DB
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 918 of 2026 Sisheeliya Kachhap @ Anjali Kachhap, aged about 42 years, Wife of Nirmal Sameer Kachhap, Resident of 19, Agahapur, Sector-41, Noida, P.O.- Noida Sector-41 Sub post office & P.S.- Gautam Budda Nagar, Uttar Pradesh
….
…. Appellant
Versus
The State of Jharkhand ….
…. Respondent
--- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR RAI
For the Appellant: Mr. Saurav Mahto, Advocate
For the Resp.-State: Spl.P.P. ---
03/ 01.09.2026 Heard Mr. Saurav Mahto, learned Counsel for the appellant and learned Spl.P.P.
2. This appeal is directed against the order dated 16.03.2026 passed in A.B.P. No. 270 of 2016, arising out of Parsudih P.S. Case No. 18 of 2025 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-V-cum- FTC (CAW) at Jamshedpur whereby and whereunder the prayer of anticipatory bail of the appellant has been rejected.
3. It has been alleged that three girls were recovered from Bokaro Railway Station on the suspicion that they were being trafficked by the appellant who was also apprehended along with the children.
4. Submission has been advanced by the learned Counsel for the appellant that it is Nisha Tiyu who is the main accused and so
( 2026:JHHC:26359-DB
far as the appellant is concerned, she was merely travelling in a train with the victims.
5. Learned Counsel submits that the appellant does not have any criminal antecedent.
6. Learned Spl.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail of the appellant and has referred to the 180 BNS statement of the victim Javni Karuwa who has categorically stated that it was the appellant who was taking her and two other girls to Delhi.
7. Regard being had to the statement of Javni Karuwa, it clearly appears that it was the appellant who was actively involved in trafficking the children and on consideration of the aforesaid facts, we are not inclined to admit the appellant on anticipatory bail. Consequently, this appeal stands dismissed.
(Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J)
(Arun Kumar Rai, J.)
1st of September, 2026
P.K.S./Suman
Uploaded