Jharkhand High Court
WPC/3361/2017 of Sri Rama Kant Kumar Vs Union Of India Through Principal Account General Audit And Anr on 28 August 2026
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No.3361 of 2017 ------ Sri Rama Kant Kumar s/o Late Ram Lakhan Singh resident of Flat No.102 P.N. Apartment, G.S. Nagar, P.S. Doranda, P.O.-Hinoo, Ranchi-834002 …. …. Petitioner Versus 1. Union of India Through, Principal
2026:JHHC:25940-DB
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P.(S) No.3361 of 2017
------
Sri Rama Kant Kumar s/o Late Ram Lakhan Singh resident of Flat No.102 P.N. Apartment, G.S. Nagar, P.S. Doranda, P.O.-Hinoo, Ranchi-834002
…. ….
Petitioner
Versus
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Union of India Through, Principal Account General (Audit), P.O.- Hinoo, P.S.-Doranda, Jharkhand, Ranchi-834002
2. Deputy Comptroller and Audit, General and appellate authority, Office of the comptroller & Auditor General of India, 9, Deen Dayal Upadhyay Marg, New Delhi-110124
..... .... Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
For the Petitioner : None
For the Respondents : Mr. Sudarshan Srivastava, Advocate
------
08/Dated: 28.08.2026
1. In the instant petition, when there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, then, this Court vide order dated 22.06.2026 had issued notice to the petitioner.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner as available on record, namely, Md. Ashrafuzzaman Khan and Mr. Pravin Kumar Rana have been reported to be no more, therefore, the notice was issued to the petitioner.
3. Based upon the office note dated 23.07.2026, this Court has passed order on 27th July, 2026 that the notice was issued upon the petitioner through ordinary process as well as through speed post and as per report of the Civil Receiving Section, no service report or undelivered notice of petitioner has been received. However, as per the speed post tracking report, the notice has been shown to be delivered to the addressee.
2026:JHHC:25940-DB
4. As per office note dated 25.08.2026, the notice has not been shown to be served through ordinary process.
5. Therefore, this Court has thought it proper to adjourn the matter awaiting the service report of the ordinary process.
6. The notice sent through speed post is concerned, as per the service report, which is kept at flag-‘S’, it has been shown to be delivered to the addressee.
7. Mr. Sudarshan Srivastava, learned counsel for the respondents, on instruction, has submitted that the petitioner is no more and so far as the wife of the petitioner is concerned, she has pre- deceased the petitioner.
8. The matter is of the year 2017 but even in spite of the steps taken by this Court, there is no appearance on behalf of the petitioner, therefore, this Court is dismissing the instant writ petition for non- prosecution.
9. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.)
(Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.)
28.08.2026 Rohit/-