Jharkhand High Court

FA/200/2023 of ASHA DIPTI TOPPO Vs PRAMOD KERKETTA on 27 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI First Appeal No. 200 of 2023 ----- Asha Dipti Toppo, aged about 31 years, wife of - Pramod Kerketta, daughter of – Simon Toppo, Resident of village- Nawatoli, P.O. & P.S.- Kolebera, District- Simdega, Jharkhand. Presently residing

2026:JHHC:25854-DB

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

First Appeal No. 200 of 2023

-----

Asha Dipti Toppo, aged about 31 years, wife of - Pramod Kerketta, daughter of – Simon Toppo, Resident of village- Nawatoli, P.O. & P.S.- Kolebera, District- Simdega, Jharkhand.

Presently residing at- Matwari East Gali No.–4, P.S.-Korrah, PO +

District – Hazaribagh, Jharkhand

… … … Appellant

Versus

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. State of Jharkhand through S.P. Hazaribagh,

2. Pramod Kerketta, Son of–Daneal Kerketta, Resident of-Nawatoli, P.O. & P.S.-Kolebera, District-Simdega, Jharkhand. Presently residing at – Anandpuri, P.S.-Korrah, P.O. + District- Hazaribagh, Jharkhand

… … … Respondents

--------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD

---------- For the Appellant : Mr. Ayush Kr. Verma, Advocate

: Miss Sonal Sodhani, Advocate For the State

: Mr. Krishna Prajapati, AC to SC-V For the Resp. No. 2 : Mr. Santosh Kumar Soni, Advocate

---------- Order No. 10 /Dated 27th August, 2026

1. Mr. Ayush Kumar Verma, learned counsel, associated with the office of Mr. Nilesh Kumar, learned counsel on record, representing the appellant–wife, on instruction, has submitted that an application has been filed for mutual divorce under Section 10 A of the Indian Divorce Act 1869.

2. The aforesaid fact has been admitted by Mr. Santosh Kumar Soni, learned counsel appearing for the respondent-husband.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant, based upon the ground that the Court having competent jurisdiction has already been approached for mutual divorce by filing an application under Section 10 A of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869, hence, he does not intend to proceed with the instant appeal.

4. In view thereof, the instant F.A. No. 200 of 2023 is dismissed as not pressed and as such, disposed of.

2026:JHHC:25854-DB

5. It goes without saying that this order will not prejudice the concerned Court while considering the issue of mutual divorce.

6. Pending I.A, if any, also stands disposed of.

(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.)

(Sanjay Prasad, J.) Date : 27.08.2026 Kamlesh/ Nishant/-

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead