Jharkhand High Court

WPC/1601/2011 of DINESH KUMAR And ANR Vs G.M.,SOUTH EASTERN RAILWAY And O on 20 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Citation No. ( 2026:JHHC:25277-DB ) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 1601 of 2011 --------- 1.Dinesh Kumar, son of Sri Awadh Bihari Mehta, resident of Electronic Loco Shed, TataNagar (S.E.R.) P.O. Golpahari, P.S.-Parsudih, Dist-Singhbhum (East) Jharkhand 2.Ravi Kumar Bharti

Neutral Citation No.

( 2026:JHHC:25277-DB )

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

W.P.(S) No. 1601 of 2011

---------

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Dinesh Kumar, son of Sri Awadh Bihari Mehta, resident of Electronic Loco Shed, TataNagar (S.E.R.) P.O. Golpahari, P.S.-Parsudih, Dist-Singhbhum (East) Jharkhand

2. Ravi Kumar Bharti son of Sri Ram Narayan Ram, resident of New Electronic Loco Shed, Tatanagar (S.E.R.) P.O.-Golpahari, P.S.-Parsudih, Dist-Singhbhum (East) Jharkhand

..… Petitioners

Versus

1. General Manager, South Eastern Railway, Garden Reach, Kolkata-43

2. Divisional Railway Manager, South Eastern Railway, Chakradharpur Division, dist.-Singhbhum (West) Jharkhand

3. Senior Divisional Electrical Engineer, South Eastern Railway, Tatanagar, Dist.-Singhbhum (East), Jharkhand

4. Senior Personal Officer, South Eastern Railway, Tatanagar, Dist.-Singhbhum (East) Jharkhand

5. Assistant Personnel Officer, South Eastern Railway, Tatanagar, Dist. Singhbhum (East) Jharkhand

….. Respondents

---------- CORAM:HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD

---------- For the Petitioners : Mrs. M.M. Pal, Sr.Advocate

Ms. Mahua Palit, Advocate For the Resp 1 to 5 : Mr. Vikas Kishore, Advocate

Senior Panel Counsel (Central Govt.)

---------- 19/20.08.2026 Mrs. M.M. Pal, Learned Senior Counsel, representing the petitioners, assisted by Ms. Mahua Palit, learned Counsel has submitted that the matter is an old one and she is having no instruction and as such she is not in a position to argue the matter. It is submitted that earlier also it has been brought to the notice of the Court that she was having no instruction and the said

Neutral Citation No.

( 2026:JHHC:25277-DB )

submission has been recorded in the order dated 22.06.2022.

2. learned counsel for the Railways is present.

3. Under the circumstances, considering the submission made by the learned Senior Counsel, the matter is to be dismissed.

4. Accordingly, this W.P.(S) No. 1601 of 2011 is dismissed.

(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.)

(Sanjay Prasad, J.) s.m. Dated 20.08.2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead