Jharkhand High Court
Cr.M.P./1712/2026 of MADDE ALIAS DEEPAK MAHLI @ DEEPAK KUMAR Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 19 August 2026
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. M. P. No. 1712 of 2026 …. Madde @ Deepak Mahli @ Deepak Kumar, aged about 29 years, son of Ashok Mahli, resident of Railway Colony, Water Colony, Chutia, PO- GPO Ranchi, PS- Chutia, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand ...…Petitioner
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
2026:JHHC:25054
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr. M. P. No. 1712 of 2026
….
Madde @ Deepak Mahli @ Deepak Kumar, aged about 29 years, son of Ashok Mahli, resident of Railway Colony, Water Colony, Chutia, PO- GPO Ranchi, PS- Chutia, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand
...…Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
…… Opp. Party
----- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD
-----
For the Petitioner : Mr. Aman Ali, Advocate For the State : Ms. Shweta Singh, A. P. P.
……
03/19.08.2026 This Cr. M.P. has been filed on behalf of the petitioner for modification of the order dated 20.02.2026 passed in B. A. No. 250 of 2026 by this Court by which Chutia P. S. Case No. 282 of 2025 has been typed instead of Chutia P. S. Case No. 282 of 2024.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that due to typographical error, in the 3rd line of para-1 and in the 8th line of para- 9 of the order dated 20.02.2026 passed by this Court in B. A. No. 250 of 2026, it has been typed as ‘Chutia P. S. Case No. 282 of 2025’ instead of ‘Chutia P. S. Case No. 282 of 2024’ and as such, the order dated 20.02.2026 passed in B. A. No. 250 of 2026 by this Court may be modified.
3. Learned counsel for the State raised no objection.
4. Heard learned counsels for the parties.
5. It transpires that due to typographical error on the part of the P.A. concerned, in the 3rd line of para-1 and in the 8th line of para- 9 of the order dated 20.02.2026 passed by this Court in B. A. No. 250 of 2026, it has been typed as ‘Chutia P. S. Case No. 282 of 2025’ instead of ‘Chutia P. S. Case No. 282 of 2024’.
2026:JHHC:25054
6. Under the circumstances, in the 3rd line of para-1 and in the 8th line of para- 9 of the order dated 20.02.2026 passed by this Court in B. A. No. 250 of 2026, it should be read as ‘Chutia P. S. Case No. 282 of 2024’ instead of ‘Chutia P. S. Case No. 282 of 2025’.
7. Thus, the order dated 20.02.2026 passed by this Court in B. A. No. 250 of 2026 is rectified and modified accordingly.
8. Accordingly, Cr. M. P. No. 1712 of 2026 is allowed and stands disposed of.
(Sanjay Prasad, J.)
Dated 19.08.2026
Kamlesh-Shahid/-