Jharkhand High Court
FA/78/2020 of AJIT KUMAR Vs REEMA PRASAD on 14 August 2026
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI F.A. No.78 of 2020 ----- Ajit Kumar, aged about 56 years, son of Suraj Narain Prasad, resident of Reema Vatika Part-01, Third Left Turning, Surya Vihar, Bartand, P.O. & P.S. Dhanbad, District Dhanbad (Jharkhand) … … Appellant Versus Reema Prasad,
2026:JHHC:24585-DB
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
F.A. No.78 of 2020
-----
Ajit Kumar, aged about 56 years, son of Suraj Narain Prasad, resident of Reema Vatika Part-01, Third Left Turning, Surya Vihar, Bartand, P.O. & P.S. Dhanbad, District Dhanbad (Jharkhand)
…
…
Appellant
Versus
Reema Prasad, daughter of Ram Narayan Prasad, resident of Part-02, Third Left Turning, Surya Vihar, Bartand, P.O.
& P.S. Dhanbad, District Dhanbad (Jharkhand).
…
…
Respondent
`-------
CORAM:HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD
-------
For the Appellant
: None
For the Respondent
: Mr. Praveen Shankar Dayal, Advocate
------
Order No. 30/Dated 14th August, 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. None is present to represent the appellant.
2. Mr. Praveen Shankar Dayal, learned counsel for the respondent-wife is present.
3. Even after waiting for substantial time, there is no appearance on behalf of the appellant, even the name of the learned counsel was displayed on the Display Board, as such, the present appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.)
(Sanjay Prasad, J.) Date : 14th August, 2026 Birendra/