Jharkhand High Court
C.M.P./437/2026 of NARESH KUMAR VERMA Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 12 August 2026
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.M.P. No. 437 of 2026 …. Naresh Kumar Verma aged about 51 years son of Late Shiv Prasad Ram, resident of Village Kalyanpur, P.O. Deoghar, P.S. Deoghar (Town), District Deoghar (Jharkhand). ……Petitioner Versus 1. The State of
2026:JHHC:24831
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
C.M.P. No. 437 of 2026
….
Naresh Kumar Verma aged about 51 years son of Late Shiv Prasad Ram, resident of Village Kalyanpur, P.O. Deoghar, P.S. Deoghar (Town), District Deoghar (Jharkhand).
……Petitioner
Versus
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The State of Jharkhand
2. Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Deoghar, P.O. & P.S. Deoghar, District Deoghar.
3. The Circle Officer, Deoghar, P.O. & P.S. Deoghar, District Deoghar.
4. Rajendra Ram son of Late Saryu Verma, resident of Village Kalynpur, P.O. Deoghar, P.S. Deoghar (Town), District Deoghar.
5. Kartik Ram son of Late Girija Ram, resident of Village Kalynpur, P.O. Deoghar, P.S. Deoghar (Town), District Deoghar.
……Opp. Parties
-----
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD
-----
For the Petitioner : Mr. Sudhansu Kr. Deo, Advocate For the OP
: None
……
02/12.08.2026 Heard learned counsel for both the sides.
2. This CMP being C.M.P. No. 437 of 2026 has been filed on behalf of the petitioner for restoration of W.P.(C) No. 4909 of 2021 which stood dismissed due to non-compliance of the order dated 10.11.2025 passed by this Court.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he has informed the learned counsel of Civil Court, Deoghar but due to non-communication and misunderstanding, the proper information was not received by the petitioner and for which the
2026:JHHC:24831
case was dismissed for default.
4. It is submitted that the petitioner will remain careful in future and will take proper steps for service of notice upon Opposite Party/Respondent Nos. 4 and 5 and hence W.P.(C) No. 4909 of 2021 may be restored.
5. None appears for the State on repeated call.
6. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and in view of the averments made in Paragraph Nos. 9 to 13, the prayer for restoration of W.P.(C) No. 4909 of 2021 is allowed.
7. Accordingly, C.M.P. No. 437 of 2026 is allowed and W.P.(C) No. 4909 of 2021 is restored to its original file.
(Sanjay Prasad, J.) Dated: 12.08.2026 RKM/