Jharkhand High Court
C.M.P./665/2026 of SHAILENDRA KUMAR JAISWAL Vs STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY on 12 August 2026
Citation No. ( 2026:JHHC:25219 ) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.M.P. No. 665 of 2026 --------- Shailendra Kumar Jaiswal ..… Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through its Chief Secretary having its office at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. Dhurwa, P.S. Jagarnathpur,
Neutral Citation No.
( 2026:JHHC:25219 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
C.M.P. No. 665 of 2026
---------
Shailendra Kumar Jaiswal
..… Petitioner
Versus
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The State of Jharkhand through its Chief Secretary having its office at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. Dhurwa, P.S. Jagarnathpur, Dist Ranchi.
2. Deputy Commissioner, Medininagar, P.O. & P.S. Medininagar, Dist. Palamau
3. Sub Divisional Officer, Husainabad, P.O. & P.S. Husainabad, Dist. Palamu
4. Circle Officer, Haidear Nagar Office at Haidarnagar, P.O. & P.S., Haidarnagar, Dist. Palamau
….. Opp.Parties
---------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD
---------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Aman Kumar, Advocate For the Opp.Party : Mr. Ratnesh Kumar, Advocate
---------- 02/12.08.2026 This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed for restoration of W.P.(C) (Filing) No. 3433 of 2025, which stood dismissed on 02.12.2025 due to non-compliance of peremptory order dated 11.11.2025 passed by this Court.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the earlier counsel for the petitioner could not take steps to comply with the order dated 11.11.2025 within time and as a result of which the W.P.(C) (Filing) No. 3433 of 2025 stood dismissed due to non-compliance of peremptory order dated 11.11.2025 passed by this Court. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted the petitioner, who comes from a marginalized background and lives in a remote area, arranged the required documents and the funds to contact the present Counsel after he got
Neutral Citation No.
( 2026:JHHC:25219 )
the news about dismissal of the writ petition from other persons and there are no intentional latches on the part of the petitioner for non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 11.11.2025 passed by this Court. Hence, the W.P.(C) (Filing) No. 3433 of 2025 may be restored and this Civil Miscellaneous Petition may be allowed.
3. No objection has been raised on behalf of the State.
4. Having heard learned counsel for both sides and in view of the averments made in Paragraph 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 of this Civil Miscellaneous Petition, prayer for restoration of W.P.(C) (Filing) No. 3433 of 2025 is allowed.
5. Accordingly, the W.P.(C) (Filing) No. 3433 of 2025 is restored to its original file and this Civil Miscellaneous Petition No. 665 of 2026 is allowed.
(Sanjay Prasad, J.) s.m. Dated 12.08.2026