Jharkhand High Court
Cont.(Cvl)/609/2026 of ONE UP MINERAL AND INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LTD. THR ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY, NAMELY, ANUPAM SINHA Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 20 July 2026
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Cvl.) No. 609 of 2026 --------- One Up Mineral & Infrastructure Private Limited, having its registered office at 603, 6th Floor, Panchwati Tower, Harmu Bye Pass Road, P.O. G.P.O., P.S. Sukhdeo Nagar, District Ranchi, 834001, Jharkhand,
[2026:JHHC:21349-DB]
Page | 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cont. Case (Cvl.) No. 609 of 2026
---------
One Up Mineral & Infrastructure Private Limited, having its registered office at 603, 6th Floor, Panchwati Tower, Harmu Bye Pass Road, P.O. G.P.O., P.S. Sukhdeo Nagar, District Ranchi, 834001, Jharkhand, through its Authorized Signatory, namely, Anupam Sinha, aged about 52 years, son of Late Suresh Prasad Sinha, resident of Qr. No.D/87, Harmu Housing Colony, P.O.
Doranda, P.S.-Argora, District Ranchi-834001, Jharkhand.
… … Petitioner
Versus
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The State of Jharkhand.
2. Mr. Nishant Abhishek, The District Mining Officer, Ramgarh, P.O. & P.S.-Ramgarh, District-Ramgarh-829122, Jharkhand.
… … Opp. Parties
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD ---------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Mukesh Kr. Banka, Advocate For the Opp. Parties : Ms. Neeharika Mazumdar, AC to AG
Ms. Oishi Das, AC to AG --------- 03/Dated: 20th July, 2026
1. Show cause has been filed in pursuance of the order dated 07.07.2026 as available at Flag-‘X’.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the order has been complied with.
3. Considering the said submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court is of the view that there is no reason to proceed further with the instant contempt case.
4. Accordingly, the instant contempt case is closed, as such, disposed of.
5. Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.)
(Sanjay Prasad, J.) 20th July, 2026 Saurabh/-