Jharkhand High Court
Cont.(Cvl)/518/2026 of HUMANITY, ORGANIZATION FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT THRO ITS SECRETARY NAMELTY AJAY KUMAR Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 15 July 2026
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Contempt Case (Civil) No. 518 of 2026 --------- Humanity, Organization for Human Development through its Secretary namely Ajay Kumar, S/o Late Ram Bihari Singh, having its office at H- 88, Argora Housing Colony, P.O.-Doranda, P.S.-Argora, District- Ranchi,
2026:JHHC:21015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Contempt Case (Civil) No. 518 of 2026
---------
Humanity, Organization for Human Development through its Secretary namely Ajay Kumar, S/o Late Ram Bihari Singh, having its office at H- 88, Argora Housing Colony, P.O.-Doranda, P.S.-Argora, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand
… … Petitioner
Versus
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The State of Jharkhand
2. Rajeshwari B, posted as Commisisoner, MGNREGA, Government of Jharkhand, having its office at Project Building Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S.-Dhurwa, Ranchi, Jharkhand
….Opp. Parties --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD
---------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Amritansh Vats, Advocate
Mr. Arpan Manjash Ekka, Advocate For the State : Mr. Manoj Kumar, G.A.-III Mr. Rakesh Kr. Roy, A.C to G.A.-III ----------- 03/Dated: 15th July, 2026
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that although the opposite party has considered the case of the petitioner in the light of the order dated 06.11.2025 passed in W.P.(C) No.2625 of 2023 by co- ordinate Bench of this Court and has rejected his prayer and, as such, he intends to challenge the said order by taking appropriate remedy in accordance with law.
2. Learned counsel for the State raises no objection.
3. Thus, in view of the submission made above, this contempt proceeding is dropped and contempt case is disposed of.
4. However, the petitioner will be at liberty to pursue the matter before the appropriate authority in accordance with law.
(Sanjay Prasad, J.) 15.07.2026 Pawan/- Uploaded on 18.07.2026