Jharkhand High Court
FA/171/2022 of SANGEETA KUMARI Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 13 July 2026
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI First Appeal No.171 of 2022 ------ Sangeeta Kumari, aged about 34 years, wife of Hemraj Chouhan and daughter of Shri Samato Lal Chouhan, resident of Ayodhya Apartment, Housing Colony, P.O; P.S. & District-Dhanbad; Permanent resident of :
2026:JHHC:20673-DB
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
First Appeal No.171 of 2022
------
Sangeeta Kumari, aged about 34 years, wife of Hemraj Chouhan and daughter of Shri Samato Lal Chouhan, resident of Ayodhya Apartment, Housing Colony, P.O; P.S.
&
District-Dhanbad;
Permanent resident of: Damoda Colliery, P.O.-Karmatand, P.S.- Dugda, District-Bokaro
…. ….
Appellant
Versus
Hemraj Chouhan, son of Late Kaluram Chouhan, resident of Sahana Pahari, P.O. & P.S.-Jharia, District-Dhanbad
..... .... Respondent
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD
For the Appellant
: Mr. Pankaj Verma, Advocate
For the Respondent : Mr. M.B. Lal, Advocate
------
11/Dated: 13.07.2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. One interlocutory application has been filed being I.A. No.8460 of 2026 on behalf of the sole respondent.
2. The purpose for filing of the aforesaid interlocutory application is to bring on record the settlement arrived at in between the parties, i.e., the appellant-wife and the respondent-husband.
3. The copy of the settlement arrived in the Office of the Mediation Centre, Bokaro dated 09.10.2025, has been appended along with the joint petition for compromise filed in Cr. Appeal No.94 of 2022 in the Court of A.D.J., IIIrd, Bokaro.
4. Learned counsel for the appellant is present and has submitted that the parties have compromised and as such, he may be allowed to withdraw this appeal.
5. Considering the submission made by the learned counsel for the appellant, the present appeal is dismissed as withdrawn and as such, disposed of.
2026:JHHC:20673-DB
6. In consequent to disposal of this appeal, interlocutory application being I.A. No.8460 of 2026 also stands disposed of.
(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.)
(Sanjay Prasad, J.) 13.07.2026 Rohit/-