Jharkhand High Court
Cont.(Cvl)/602/2026 of RANJU DEVI Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 7 July 2026
- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Contempt Case (Civil) No. 602 of 2026 ---- Ranju Devi wife of Sri Prem Ranjan Mahto aged about 54 years Resident Village-Dhumsatoli Chutia, P.O. & P.S.-Chutia, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand … … Petitioner Versus 1. The
2026:JHHC:20014-DB
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Contempt Case (Civil) No. 602 of 2026
----
Ranju Devi wife of Sri Prem Ranjan Mahto aged about 54 years Resident Village-Dhumsatoli Chutia, P.O. & P.S.-Chutia, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand
…
… Petitioner
Versus
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The State of Jharkhand
2. Anvesha Ona, at present Posted as the Circle Officer (C.O) Khunti, Post Office-Khunti, Police Station-Khunti, District-Khunti, Jharkhand.
… … Opp. Parties
------- CORAM :HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Shyam Sundar Pd. Kushwaha, Advocate For the Opp. Parties : Mr. Rahul Kamlesh, AC to SC IV
-------- Order No. 06 : Dated 7th July, 2026
1. The instant contempt case has been filed for alleged non- compliance of order dated 24th August, 2023 passed in L.P.A. No. 198 of 2021.
2. Mr. Rahul Kamlesh, learned AC to SC IV appeared and waived notice on behalf of Opp. Parties.
3. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the Opp. Parties by referring to Annexure 2 to the contempt case, which is an order dated 15th May, 2024 passed by this Court in Contempt Case (Civil) No. 323 of 2024, that for the same order the instant contempt case has been filed.
4. It has further been submitted that the said contempt case being Contempt Case (Civil) No. 323 of 2024 has been disposed of as rendered to be infructuous. But, again the instant contempt case has been filed for alleged non-compliance of dated 24th August, 2023 passed in L.P.A. No. 198 of 2021.
2026:JHHC:20014-DB
5. Learned counsel for the Opp. Parties further by referring to the statement made in the contempt has submitted that appeal Mutation Appeal No. 117 of 23-24 has been preferred, which is still pending, however, learned counsel for the Opp. Parties with all fairness has submitted that appellate authority will decide the appeal expeditiously being conscious of the fact that the appeal is of the year 2023-24.
6. Upon this, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that since the appeal being Mutation Appeal No. 17 of 23-24 is still pending as such he is not pressing the instant contempt case with liberty to pursue the mutation appeal pending before the Deputy Commissioner Land Reforms, Khunti.
7. With the liberty aforesaid, the instant contempt case is disposed of.
(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.)
(Sanjay Prasad, J.)
7th July, 2026 Alankar/