Jharkhand High Court
FA/332/2023 of RAFIQUE ANSARI Vs NASIMA PRAVEEN on 7 July 2026
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI First Appeal No.332 of 2023 ------ Rafique Ansari, aged about 45 years, son of Late Rasid Ansari, resident of Village-Chandankiyari, P.O. & P.S.-Chandankiyari, District-Bokaro …. …. Appellant Versus 1. Nasima Praveen, wife of
2026:JHHC:19931-DB
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
First Appeal No.332 of 2023
------
Rafique Ansari, aged about 45 years, son of Late Rasid Ansari, resident of Village-Chandankiyari, P.O. & P.S.-Chandankiyari, District-Bokaro
…. ….
Appellant
Versus
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Nasima Praveen, wife of Rafique Ansari
2. Md. Nabi Ansari, S/o Not given (Nana of respondent No.3 and 4)
3. Nilofar, aged about 17 years
4. Khushi @ Nasrin Naz, aged about 15 years Both daughters of Rafique Ansari; Representede through her mother namely Nasima Praveen All are residents of Village-New Pindra Goriya (Bhawanipur Site), P.O. & P.S.-Chas, District-Bokaro
5. General Public of Village-New Pindra Goriya (Bhawanipur Site), P.O. & P.S.-Chas, District-Bokaro
..... .... Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD
For the Appellant : Mr. Ajit Kumar, Advocate
Mr. Abhijit Kumar, Advocate
For the Respondent :
------
07/Dated: 07.07.2026
1. The instant appeal under Section 19(1) of the Family Courts Act is directed against the judgment dated 23.09.2023 (Decree signed on 30.09.2023) passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Bokaro in Original Suit No.382 of 2021.
2. Mr. Ajit Kumar, learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that during pendency of the instant appeal, the minor daughters have attained their majority and as such, he does not intend to press this appeal.
3. Accordingly, the instant appeal is dismissed as not pressed and as such, disposed of.
2026:JHHC:19931-DB
4. In consequence thereof, pending interlocutory application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.)
(Sanjay Prasad, J.) 07.07.2026 Rohit/-