Jharkhand High Court
FA/179/2024 of AVINASH KUMAR Vs SANGITA KUMARI on 6 July 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI F.A. No. 179 of 2024 Avinash Kumar aged about 39 Yrs. S/o Basudeo Prasad, resident of Meena Bazar, P.O. & P.S. Madhupur, District- Deoghar. …. --- Appellant Versus Sangita Kumari Prasad aged about 36 Years, W/o Avinash Kumar, D/o
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
2026:JHHC:19802-DB
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
F.A. No. 179 of 2024
Avinash Kumar aged about 39 Yrs. S/o Basudeo Prasad, resident of Meena Bazar, P.O. & P.S. Madhupur, District- Deoghar. ….
--- Appellant Versus Sangita Kumari Prasad aged about 36 Years, W/o Avinash Kumar, D/o Munnilal Prasad, R/o Meena Bazar Mohalla, P.O. & P.S. Madhupur, District- Deoghar, presently residing Maria Near Montesari Public School, Mohalla Rajbari, P.O. & P.S. Mihijam, District Jamtara. …. --- Respondent
---
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD
---
For the Appellant:
None
For the Respondent:
Mr. Lalit Yadav, Advocate
---
10 / 06.07.2026 None is present to represent the appellant.
2. It needs to refer herein that the matter was taken up in pre-lunch session but at that time none represented the appellant, therefore, the case has been directed to be called upon in the post lunch session.
3. Even in the post lunch session, none is present to represent the appellant.
4. Accordingly, the instant appeal being F.A. No. 179 of 2024 is dismissed for non-prosecution.
5. Let this order be communicated to the learned Family Judge, Jamtara for the needful.
(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.)
(Sanjay Prasad, J.)
Date: 06.07.2026 RKM