Jharkhand High Court
C.M.P./590/2024 of VIVEKANAND BHUINYA Vs STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY on 30 June 2026
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.M.P. No.590 of 2024 ------ 1. Vivekanand Bhuinya 2. Richa Shivika 3. Binita Xalxo 4. Pallavi Tiwari 5. Kumar Chetan Lal 6. Vasudha Sharma 7. Anwesha Aditi 8. Apurva Tomar 9. Rahul Ganguly …. …. Applicants/Interveners Versus 1.
2026:JHHC:19101-DB
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
C.M.P. No.590 of 2024
------
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Vivekanand Bhuinya
2. Richa Shivika
3. Binita Xalxo
4. Pallavi Tiwari
5. Kumar Chetan Lal
6. Vasudha Sharma
7. Anwesha Aditi
8. Apurva Tomar
9. Rahul Ganguly …. …. Applicants/Interveners
Versus
1. State of Jharkhand through Chief Secretary, Government of Jharkhand, Project Building, PO-Dhurwa, PS-Jagannathpur, Dhurwa, Dist-Ranchi-834004.
2. State of Jharkhand through Secretary, Urban & Housing Development Department
3. Department of Personnel, Administrative Reforms and Rajbhasa, Government of Jharkhand, through Secretary
4. Jharkhand Public Service Commission through its Secretary
5. Controller of Examination, Jharkhand Public Service Commission
6. Union of India through Secretary, Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs, New Delhi-1100011
..... .... Respondents/Opp. Parties
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD
For the Petitioners : Mrs. Sonam, Advocate
For the State
: AC to AG
For the JPSC : Mr. Sanjoy Piprawall, Advocate Mr. Prince Kumar, Advocate
------
06/Dated: 30.06.2026
1. Mrs. Sonam, learned counsel for the petitioners, on instruction, has submitted that she is not pressing the instant petition.
2. Accordingly, the instant civil misc. petition is dismissed as withdrawn and as such, disposed of.
(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.)
(Sanjay Prasad, J.) 30.06.2026 Rohit/-