W.P.(Cr.)/75/2026 of AKHTARI KHATUN Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 30 June 2026

1. The State of Jharkhand

2. The Director General of Police, Jharkhand, P.O. & P.S.-Dhurwa, District-Ranchi.

3. The Superintendent of Police, Chatra, P.O. & P.S.-Chatra, District- Chatra.

4. The Officer-in-charge, Lavalong Police Station, P.O. & P.S.- Lavalong, District-Chara.

5. The Officer-in-charge, Tandwa Police Station, P.O. & P.S.-Tandwa, District-Chatra.

6. Union of India through National Investigating Agency (NIA)

7. National Investigating Agency (NIA) through Superintendent of Police, Ranchi Zone, P.O Dorande & P.S. Jagannathpur, Ranchi, Jharkhand.

..... .... Respondents

CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD

For the Petitioner : Mr. Amitabh Prasad, Advocate

For the State

: Mr. Navneet Toppo, AC to GP-I

For the NIA

: Mr. Amit Kr. Das, Advocate

Mr. Saurav Kumar, Advocate

------

10/Dated: 30.06.2026 I.A. No.2933 of 2026

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave of this Court not to press the instant interlocutory application.

2. Accordingly, interlocutory application being I.A. No.2933 of 2026 is dismissed as not pressed and as such, disposed of. W.P.(Cr.) (D.B)(H.B) No.75 of 2026

3. This writ petition is under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking therein the following reliefs: -

a) For issuance of appropriate Writ(s)/Order(s)/direction(s) in the nature of habeas corpus giving direction upon the respondents to produce the corpus (Son of the Petitioner

2026:JHHC:19097-DB

namely Md Suhail Akhtar) before the Hon’ble Court as the sone of the petitioner has been detained by the Police officials since 27.01.2026 without giving any reasons.

b) For issuance of an appropriate Writ(s)/Order(s)/direction(s) commanding upon the respondents to conduct enquiry and punish the erring police officials for illegally detain the sone of the petitioner in lockup of the police station for more than 24 hours without assigning any reason.

4. It has been informed that the corpus has been produced.

5. Mr. Navneet Toppo, learned AC to GP-I appearing for the respondent-State by placing the latest affidavit has submitted that the issue of larger conspiracy has also been taken care of and the accused persons have been apprehended. It has also been submitted that the charge-sheet has been submitted against them.

6. So far as the departmental proceeding initiated against the erring Police Officials is concerned, the same has also been concluded culminating into the order of punishment withholding one annual increment equivalent to two black marks.

7. Considering the aforesaid fact, this Court is of the view that the present writ petition is to be disposed of.

8. Accordingly, the instant writ petition stands disposed of.

9. Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.)

(Sanjay Prasad, J.) 30.06.2026 Rohit/-