Jharkhand High Court
Cr.M.P./213/2026 of VIVAN INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR MR VIVEK KUMAR Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 17 June 2026
Citation No. ( 2026:JHHC:17927 ) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 213 of 2026 --------- Vivan Industries Private Limited, through its Director Mr. Vivek Kumar ..… Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2.Prakash Kumar Singh ….. Opp.Parties ----------
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr.M.P. No. 213 of 2026
---------
Vivan Industries Private Limited, through its Director Mr. Vivek Kumar
..… Petitioner
Versus
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The State of Jharkhand
2. Prakash Kumar Singh
….. Opp.Parties
---------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD
---------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Girish Mohan Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. V.S. Sahay, A.P.P. For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. Arpan Mishra, Advocate
Ms. Ashwini Priya, Advocate
---------- 06/17.06.2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.P.P. and learned counsel for the O.P.No.2.
2. During the course of argument, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to delete “for restoration of Criminal Revision No.136 of 2025 in its original form” in page no.1 of the Cr.M.P. No. 213 of 2026 during course of the day.
3. Permission, as sought for, is granted.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner is allowed to delete “for restoration of Criminal Revision No.136 of 2025 in its original form” in page no.1 of the Cr.M.P. No. 213 of 2026 during course of the day.
5. This Cr.M.P. No. 213 of 2026 has been filed on behalf of the petitioner, namely Vivan Industries Private Limited through its Director (i.e. O.P. No.2 in Criminal Revision No. 136 of 2025, for modification of the order dated 07.07.2025 passed in Criminal Revision No.136 of 2025 to the extent that the O.P. No.2 herein, namely Prakash Kumar Singh
(i.e. Petitioner in Criminal Revision No. 136 of 2025) may be directed to revalidate the Demand Draft received by the petitioner herein (i.e. O.P. No.2 in Criminal Revision No. 136 of 2025) from the Registry of this Court.
6. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in the light of order dated 07.07.2025, passed by this Court, the petitioner herein (i.e. O.P. No.2 in Cr. Revision No.136 of 2025) was directed to obtain the said Demand Draft of Rs.8,40,000/- (Rupees Eight lakh Forty thousand only) from the office of the Registrar General of this Court by making proper application.
7. It is submitted that the petitioner has received the Demand Draft on 06.08.2025 and deposited the it on the same day, however, the same was returned by the Bank, i.e. the Canara Bank, Ranchi Main Branch, Ranchi on the ground of “Instrument out of date” (Photocopy of the Return Memo dated 07.08.2025) is enclosed as Annexure-3).
8. It is further submitted that O.P. No.2, namely Prakash Kumar Singh (i.e. the petitioner in Criminal Revision No.136 of 2025) has now got the Demand Draft revalidated and hence, the same may be handed over to the learned counsel for the petitioner herein (i.e. O.P. No. 2 in the Criminal Revision No. 136 of 2025).
9. Mr. V.S. Sahay, learned A.P.P. appearing for the State has raised no objection.
10. Learned counsel for O.P.No.2 herein has submitted that she has also no objection and is ready to hand over the revalidated Demand Draft of Rs.8,40,000/- (Rupees Eight lakh Forty thousand only) to the learned counsel for the petitioner (i.e. O.P. No.2 in Criminal Revision No.136 of 2025) in the light of the Order dated 07.07.2025 passed in Criminal Revision No. 136 of 2025.
11. Perused the record of this case and considered the submission made on behalf of learned counsel for both sides.
12. It appears that this Court, vide order dated 07.07.2025, passed in Criminal Revision No. 136 of 2025, has allowed the Criminal Revision No.136 of 2025 in terms of compromise between the petitioner and the O.P. No.2 and has further directed O.P. No.2 (i.e. petitioner in Criminal Revision No.136 of 2025) to pay Rs.8,40,000/- (Rupees Eight lakh Forty thousand only) by way of Demand Draft to be deposited in the Office of the learned Registrar General.
13. It appears that the Demand Draft was prepared on 07.05.2025 and as such when the petitioner (O.P. No. 2 in Criminal Revision No. 136 of 2026) received the same on 06.08.2025, its validity period has already expired.
14. It appears that now the O.P. No.2 (i.e. petitioner in Criminal Revision No. 136 of 2025) has revalidated the Demand Draft on 15.06.2026 and has produced photocopy of the same before this Court.
Let the photocopy of the Demand Draft be kept on record.
15. Under the circumstances, learned counsel for the O.P. No. 2 is directed to hand over the Demand Draft of Rs.8,40,000/- (Rupees Eight lakh forty thousand) to the learned counsel for the petitioner.
16. Thus, this Cr.M.P. No. 213 of 2026 is allowed and stands disposed of.
17. Let a copy of this order be sent to the learned Court below.
(Sanjay Prasad, J.) s.m. Dated 17.06.2026