Jharkhand High Court
Cont.(Cvl)/1217/2025 of KANTU KUMAR THAKUR Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 16 June 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Contempt Case (Cvl.) No.1217 of 2025 ----- Kantu Kumar Thakur, aged about 29 years, son of Late Shiv Narayan Thakur, resident of Village - Benti, P.O. Behera, P.S. Piparwar, District – Chatra ....... …Writ
2026:JHHC:17409-DB
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Contempt Case (Cvl.) No.1217 of 2025
-----
Kantu Kumar Thakur, aged about 29 years, son of Late Shiv Narayan Thakur, resident of Village - Benti, P.O. Behera, P.S. Piparwar, District – Chatra ....... …Writ Petitioner/Appellant/Petitioner
Versus
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The State of Jharkhand
2. Shri Manoj Kumar, son of not known to the petitioner, Chairman, Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd. Through its Chairman-cum-Managing Director, having its office at Gondwana Place, Kanke Road, P.O. & P.S. Kanke, District -Ranchi.
3. Shri Ajay Kumar, Son of not known to the petitioner, The Director (P & A1), Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd. Having its office at Gondwana Place, Kanke Road, P.O. & P.S. Kanke, District – Ranchi.
4. Shri Sanjay Kadambar, Son of not known to the petitioner, The General Manager (P &A1), Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd. having its office at Gondwana Place, Kanke Road, P.O. & P.S. Kanke, District - Ranchi … … Opposite Parties/Contemnors ------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD ------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Harsh Vardhan, Advocate
For the OPs-CMPDI : Mr. Amit Kumar Das, Advocate For the State : Mr. Krishna Prajapati, AC to SC-V ------
Order No.03/Dated: 16th June 2026
1. The present contempt case has been preferred alleging willful and deliberate non-compliance of the order of this Court dated 15.07.2025 passed in L.P.A No.541 of 2024.
2. Mr. Harsh Vardhan, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has submitted that the order of this Court has been complied with and the grievance of the petitioner has already been redressed and, as such, he does not want to press the instant contempt case.
3. Mr. Amit Kumar Das, the learned counsel appearing for the concerned opposite party has corroborated the said fact.
4. Considering the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as by the learned counsel appearing for the concerned opposite party stating that the order of this Court has 2026:JHHC:17409-DB
2
already been complied with, this Contempt Case is closed and disposed of, as such.
5. Pending I.As, if any, stands disposed of.
(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.)
(Sanjay Prasad, J.)
Dated:16.06.2026. Sudhir