Jharkhand High Court
W.P.(Cr.)/180/2026 of VISHAL VIBHAR Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY on 12 June 2026
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (Cr) (D.B.) No. 180 of 2026 ----- Vishal Vibhar, aged about 26 years, son of Jyoti Vibhar, resident of R/o House No- 25, Dindli Enclave, P.O. & P.S.- Kadma, Town- Jamshedpur, District – East Singhbhum … … …
2026:JHHC:17102-DB
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P. (Cr) (D.B.) No. 180 of 2026
-----
Vishal Vibhar, aged about 26 years, son of Jyoti Vibhar, resident of R/o House No- 25, Dindli Enclave, P.O. & P.S.- Kadma, Town- Jamshedpur, District – East Singhbhum
… … … Petitioner
Versus
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The State of Jharkhand through Chief Secretary having it office at Project Building, P.O.- Dhurwa, P.S.-Jagarnathpur, District- Ranchi,
2. Under Secretary, Department of Home, Prison & Disaster Management, Government of Jharkhand, having its Office at Project Bhawan, P.O.- Dhurwa, P.S.-Jagarnathpur, District- Ranchi,
3. The District Magistrate – Cum – Deputy Commissioner, East Singhbhum, P.O. & P.S. – Bistupur, Town-Jamshedpur, District – East Singhbhum,
4. The Senior Superintendent of Police, East Singhbhum, P.O. & P.S.- Sakchi, Town- Jamshedpur, District – East Singhbhum.
… … … Respondents
--------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD
---------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Bhaswat Prakash, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Jai Prakash, AAG-IA
: Ms. Omiya Anusha, AC to AAG-IA
---------- Order No. 06/Dated 12th June, 2026
1. Mr. Bhaswat Prakash, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner on instruction from Mr. Pran Pranay, learned counsel on record, has submitted that the reliefs sought for in this writ petition have become infructuous, since, fresh order has been passed.
2. Such submission has been made in presence of Mr. Jai Prakash, learned AAG-IA.
3. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the instant writ petition has become infructuous and disposed of as such.
(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.)
(Sanjay Prasad, J.) Date : .12.06.2026 Kamlesh/ Nishant/-