Jharkhand High Court
Cont.(Cvl)/379/2026 of M/S PREMIUM INFRA LOGISTICS PRIVATE LIMITED Vs STATE OF JHARKHAND on 11 June 2026
Page 1 of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No. 379 of 2026 ------ M/s Premium Infra Logistics Private Limited having its office at Adventz Infinity @ 5, Suite No.912, 9th floor, Block BN-5, Sector-V, Salt Late Kolkata (West Bengal), represented through its
2026:JHHC:17022-DB
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cont. Case (Civil) No. 379 of 2026
------
M/s Premium Infra Logistics Private Limited having its office at Adventz Infinity @ 5, Suite No.912, 9th floor, Block BN-5, Sector-V, Salt Late Kolkata (West Bengal), represented through its Authorized Signatory – Shailendra Kumar Singh, aged about 58 years, S/o Late Aambika Singh, R/o-Road No. 10, P.O. & P.S.- Adityapur, District- Seraikela Kharsawan, Jharkhand, Pincode- 831013
... Petitioner
Versus
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. State of Jharkhand
2. Shri Arava Rajkamal (father’s name not known to the Petitioner), working as Secretary, Department of Mines and Geology, Govt. of Jharkhand having its office at Yojna Bhawan, Nepal House, P.O. & P.S.-Doranda, Ranchi-834002.
... Opp. Parties
CORAM
: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD
For the Petitioner : Mr. Sankalp Goswami, Advocate
For the Respondent : AC to AG
------
03/Dated: 11th June, 2026
1. The instant case has been filed for alleged deliberate and willful non- compliance of the order dated 08.10.2025 passed by this Court in W.P. (C) No. 4590 of 2025.
2. Pursuant to the order dated 17th April 2026, show cause has been filed.
3. Learned counsel appearing for the concerned opposite party has submitted that the reasoned order has been passed in terms of the order dated 08.10.2025, which is the subject matter of this case.
2026:JHHC:17022-DB
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in pursuance of the order dated 08.10.2025, reasoned order has been passed, however, the claim of the petitioner has been rejected, and as such the contempt case may be disposed of with the liberty to the petitioner to challenge the same before the appropriate forum.
5. No objection has been raised by the learned counsel appearing for the concerned opposite party.
6. Considering the fact that a reasoned order has been passed in terms of the order dated 08.10.2025, this Court is of the view that there is no need to proceed further in this contempt case.
7. Accordingly, the instant contempt case, being Cont. Case (Civil) No. 379 of 2026, is disposed of with liberty reserved to the petitioner to challenge the order dated 24.04.2026 passed by the Department of Mines & Geology, Government of Jharkhand (appended as Annexure- A to the show cause filed by the opposite party), if the petitioner so wishes.
(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.)
(Sanjay Prasad, J.) 11th June, 2026 Samarth Uploaded on 12.06.2026