Jharkhand High Court
Cr.M.P./1184/2026 of PAWAN DAS ALIAS PAWAN KUMAR DAS Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 10 June 2026
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. M.P No. 1184 of 2026 Pawan Das @ Pawan Kumar Das, aged about 24 years, son of Late Kedar Das, Resident of Village- Rupabad, Police Station-Pathrol, Dist-Deoghar, Jharkhand …… Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
2026:JHHC:16776
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr. M.P No. 1184 of 2026
Pawan Das @ Pawan Kumar Das, aged about 24 years, son of Late Kedar Das, Resident of Village- Rupabad, Police Station-Pathrol, Dist-Deoghar, Jharkhand
…… Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
……. Opp. Party
---------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD
---------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Satyanshu Shubham, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Shiv Shankar Kumar, APP
----------- 04/Dated:10th June, 2026 This Cr.M.P No.1184 of 2026 has been filed on behalf of the petitioner for restoration of B.A. No.10949 of 2025 which stood dismissed for default on 17.02.2026 passed by this Court.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that due to inadvertence, he could not mark B.A. No.10949 of 2025 which was listed before this Court on 17.02.2026 and as such the case was dismissed for non-prosecution, as none appeared on behalf of the petitioner. It is further submitted that he will remain careful in future and shall argue the case on merit. It is submitted that due to laches on the part of the counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner may not suffer. It is submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 22.09.2025 and hence, B.A. No.10949 of 2025 may be restored.
3. Learned APP has raised no objection.
4. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that B.A. No.10949 of 2025 has been dismissed on 17.02.2026 due to non-appearance on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioner and as the learned counsel for the petitioner has given Undertaking that he will remain vigilant and argue the case, the prayer for restoration of B.A. No.10949 of 2025 is allowed.
2026:JHHC:16776
5. Thus, Cr.M.P. No. 1184 of 2026 is allowed and B.A. No.10949 of 2025 is restored to its original file.
6. Office is directed to place the B.A. No.10949 of 2025 before the appropriate Bench as per roster.
(Sanjay Prasad, J.) Dated: 10.06.2026 Saket/-