Jharkhand High Court

Cont.(Cvl)/656/2025 of ARUN KUMAR Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 15 May 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Page 1 of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Contempt Case (Civil) No. 656 of 2025 ------ Arun Kumar, aged about 63 years, S/o Late Ramrup Prasad, R/o Krishna apartment Flat No. 201, Near Jaipal Singh Stadium, P.O.- G.P.O. P.S.-Kotwali, District- Ranchi ... Petitioner Versus 1.

2026:JHHC:15164-DB

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

Contempt Case (Civil) No. 656 of 2025

------

Arun Kumar, aged about 63 years, S/o Late Ramrup Prasad, R/o Krishna apartment Flat No. 201, Near Jaipal Singh Stadium, P.O.- G.P.O.

P.S.-Kotwali, District- Ranchi

... Petitioner

Versus

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The State of Jharkhand

2. Alka Tiwari, Chief Secretary, State of Jharkhand, P.O. & P.S.-Dhurwa, District- Ranchi.

3. Sri Manoj Prasad, the then Registrar, High Court of Jharkhand, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, Ranchi, Jharkhand

4. Sri Satya Prakash Singha, the Present Registrar, High Court of Jharkhand P.O. & P.S.-Dhurwa, Ranchi, Jharkhand.

5. Avinash Kumar, the present Chief Secretary, Govt. of Jharkhand Ist Floor, Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, Ranchi

... Respondent

CORAM

: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD

For the Petitioner : Mr. Kalyan Roy, Advocate

For the State

: Mr. Ashok Kumar Yadav, Sr.S.C.-I

For the O.P-3

: Mr. M.S. Mittal, Sr. Advocate

: Mr. Salona Mittal, Advocate

: Ms. Divya Choudhury, Advocate

: Mr. Yashdeep Kanhai, Advocate

: Mr. Sourava K. Jha, Advocate

: Mr. Arya Vardhan Singh, Advocate

For the O.P.-4

: Mr. Amit Kumar Sinha, Advocate

: Mr. Shubham Malviya, Advocate

------

06/Dated: 15th May, 2026

I.A. No. 6567 of 2026:

1. The instant interlocutory application has been filed for withdrawal of the present contempt case in view of the order passed by the

2026:JHHC:15164-DB

Hon’ble Apex Court in Civil Appeal No. 13892 of 2025 in which order was passed on 26.02.2026 as appended as Annexure-1 to the interlocutory application.

2. There is no opposition on behalf of the opposite parties.

3. Considering the same, the present interlocutory application is allowed.

4. In consequence thereof, contempt case being Contempt Case (Civil) No. 656 of 2025 is allowed to be withdrawn, and as such, disposed of.

5. Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.

(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.)

(Sanjay Prasad, J.) 15th May, 2026 Samarth

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead