Jharkhand High Court

Cont.(Cvl)/503/2026 of M/S RSB TRANSMISSIONS (INDIA) LIMITED, THROUGH ITS ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER, MR. S.M. NAUSHERWAN Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 14 May 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Contempt Case (Cvl.) No.503 of 2026 ----- M/s RSB Transmissions (India) Limited, a company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1956, having its administrative office at Plot No. NS-14(P), 15 to 26, Phase-6, & Phase-7, & Ward No.

2026:JHHC:14884-DB

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

Contempt Case (Cvl.) No.503 of 2026

-----

M/s RSB Transmissions (India) Limited, a company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1956, having its administrative office at Plot No. NS-14(P), 15 to 26, Phase-6, & Phase-7, & Ward No. 7, Adityapur Industrial Area, Gamharia, Town-Jamshedpur, P.O. and P.S.-Adityapur, District-Saraikela-Kharsawan, Jharkhand-832108, through its Assistant General Manager, Mr. S.M. Nausherwan, son of SM Jalaluddin (Late), aged about 58 years, resident of Gulab Bagh Colony Phase-1, Pardih Road, P.O. and P.S.-Mango, Jamshedpur, District-East Singhbhum, Jharkhand 831012. ....... …

Petitioner

Versus

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The State of Jharkhand

2. Atul Bhatnagar, Managing Director, Tata Steel Utilities and Infrastructure Services Limited (formerly known as Jamshedpur Utilities and Services Company Limited/JUSCO), having its office at Sakchi Boulevard Road, Northern Town, Bistupur, P.O and P.S- Bistupur, town-Jamshedpur, District-East Singhbhum, Jharkhand- 831001. … … Opposite Parties/Contemnors ------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD ------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Yashdeep Kanhai , Advocate

For the OPs

: ……

Order No.04/Dated: 14th May, 2026

1. The present contempt petition has been listed on the Board under the heading “Orders (Withdrawal of Cases)”.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instruction, seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the present contempt petition.

3. Leave, as prayed for, is granted.

4. Accordingly, the present contempt petition stands dismissed as withdrawn and disposed of as such.

5. Pending I.As, if any, stands disposed of.

(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.)

(Sanjay Prasad, J.) Dated:14.05.2026 Sudhir

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead