Jharkhand High Court
C.R./50/2025 of AJIT SAH ALIAS AJIT KUMAR Vs DIVISIONAL MANAGER, UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD on 13 May 2026
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Civil Revision No.50 of 2025 Ajit Sah @ Ajit Kumar aged about 23 son of Late Pramod Sah, resident of Village Jhikatia, P.O and P.S-Imamganj, District Gaya, at present residing at Khadgarah, P.O-Hehal, P.S-Sukhdeonagar, District Ranchi (Jharkhand)
2026:JHHC:14743
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Civil Revision No.50 of 2025
Ajit Sah @ Ajit Kumar aged about 23 son of Late Pramod Sah, resident of Village Jhikatia, P.O and P.S-Imamganj, District Gaya, at present residing at Khadgarah, P.O-Hehal, P.S-Sukhdeonagar, District Ranchi (Jharkhand)
…… Petitioner
Versus
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Divisional Manager, United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Division Office, Lalji Hirji Road, P.O. Ranchi, P.S-Kotwali, District Ranchi.
2. Ganpat Sah @ Ganpat Saw son of Late Mahavir Sah.
3. Smt. Longia Devi wife of Ganpat Saw, Both residents of Village Jhikatia, P.O and P.S-Imamganj, District Gaya, at present residing at Khadgarah, P.O-Hehal, P.S- Sukhdeonagar, District Ranchi (Jharkhand) ……. Opp. Parties
---------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD
---------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Sameer Saurabh, Advocate
: Mr. Krishna Kumar Saw, Advocate For the O.P. No.1 : Mr. Alok Lal, Advocate
: Mr. Santosh Kumar, Advocate
For the O.P. No.2 & 3 : Mr. Shreyansh Kumar Basudevam, Adv.
----------- 08/Dated:13th May, 2026 The present Civil Revision Application has been filed on behalf of the petitioner challenging the order dated 18.06.2024 passed in Miscellaneous Civil Application No.268 of 2024, by which the petition filed under Section 152 read with Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure has been rejected by the learned Presiding Officer, Motor Vehicles Accident Claims Tribunal, Ranchi.
2. Heard learned counsel for both the sides.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner during course of submission has submitted that the petitioner will file all necessary documents before the learned Trial Court.
2026:JHHC:14743
4. During course of argument, it has been submitted by the learned counsel for the O.P. No.1-the Insurance Company that he has no objection in payment of cheque in question to the claimant and if the name of the petitioner is corrected then the Insurance Company will deposit the modified cheque in the name of the petitioner before the Tribunal i.e. Presiding Officer, Motor Vehicles Accident Claims Tribunal, Ranchi.
5. From perusal of the order dated 18.06.2024, it appears that the petition of the petitioner has been rejected on the ground that the claimant has filed only Aadhar Card and has not filed any other document and also on the ground that the claimant- petitioner did not appear before the Tribunal.
6. Under the circumstances, the order dated 18.06.2024 passed in Miscellaneous Civil Application No.268 of 2024 by the Presiding Officer, Motor Vehicles Accident Claims Tribunal, Ranchi is set aside with the direction to the learned Presiding Officer, Motor Vehicles Accident Claims Tribunal, Ranchi to decide the matter afresh by looking into the documents filed by the petitioner afresh.
7. Accordingly, the Civil Revision No.50 of 2025 is allowed and stands disposed of.
8. The learned Tribunal is directed to decide the case expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of copy of the order.
(Sanjay Prasad, J.) Dated: 13.05.2026 Saket/-